No, you can and I do hold him responsible for holding prisoners at Guantanamo Bay for years without charging them with any crime, for the Patriot Act and the administration's utter disregard for personal privacy and civil liberties, for the rapid growth in spending on his watch, and lots of things that probably bother you but not me that he's done or permitted to be done. And if you would disagree with the decision to go to war even if the intelligence had been correct, you can hold him accountable for that. I just think its silly to hold him accountable for poor intelligence. As Fu ably points out, we've apparently been wrong for a long time on that score.