cemeterypolka Wrote:
i kind of want to glorify the underdog, the person who is made fun of for the way they look, or the way they act, etc. but in the process i'm humiliating them myself. i think that in my work i'm poking fun at myself and humans for being disgusting slobs that will forever be complex and contradictory.
interesting. i'm all about glorifying the the idiosycrancies of the human figure. the less that socially ideal figure. well, that's part of my work. the best model i ever got to study was a man who was 78. he was not buff at all, had a long scraggly beard, sagging flesh and skin and was partially bald but it was pretty magnificent to get the chance to draw him. he couldn't have been more human.
cemeterypolka Wrote:
my art teacher told me that the fat androgynous figure is my flag. like jasper johns.
do you think this is a negative thing?
i don't. you've got a handle, a device to use to convey your feelings/ideas. susan rothenberg used that damn horse forever and a day*. when you're done with it, you'll stop. for now it's working. go with it.
there are artists who plan and think and plan and think. i'm not one of them and you certainly are not either. you shouldn't think about it too much. right now your work is so intuitive and not self concious at all. don't let your brain get in the way.
*if you ever get a chance there's a program that ran on pbs called art in the 21st century. you may be able to streamline episodes. susan rothenberg (who i adore) was interviewed and talked about her horse paintings. it was fascinating.