HaqDiesel Wrote:
Yeah, I think it would take a lot for this to happen. First, the Supreme Court rarely turns right around and overrules a recent previous decision just because the supposed political alignment of the court changes. Second, there's no guarantee that the issue will come before the court any time soon.
Drinky, I think that you would be right to classify this as sensationalist. For all the talk of dissolving civil liberties, I don't think the balance of powers has been THAT upset. And we should remember that a lot of the things that people point to with this kind of thinking (war, Patriot Act, etc.) got a lot of Democrat (and Liberal) votes. I think as much as anything, the last four years highlights the failures of the Democratic party to stand by their principles and offer up a decent candidate.
The Dems are in a pretty good spot to gain, for three reasons. The first is, they are still losing ground, and it's going to be hard to lose much more.
Also, the party would do itself justice by forgetting the 2000 election, burying the hatchet and moving a bit towards the middle, especially economically. Gore is gone, Daschle is gone and you really don't want to run Hillary. Edwards should be on good footing for '08. He ran a close campaign and performed well and showed some broad appeal, now he can take a few years off and come back as a force to be reckoned with in four years. That is assuming that the Dems don't let the Clintons run the party to perpetuate their own legacy.
Third, the Dems should not take petty obstructionist stances to impede the GOP, especially since the GOP has the Executive and Legislative Branches. Give them enough rope, and they will most certainly hang themselves. They have held Congress for 10 years now, and their bellies are quite full from gorging at the public trough--one of the reasons they knocked off the Dems in 1994.
If they sit back and wait, the Democrats have a chance to have their own takeover. GWB has four years in which he will most likely continue to irritate and frustrate more voters. If he does a handy enough job, their could be enough backlash in four years to make up some Democrat ground. They must nullify the sympathy vote, however. Any claims of "not letting the President do his job" work completely against them.
Take a look at John Major, whose second term paved the way for a Tony Blair/Labour party landslide. This election may not be wholly bad for the Democrats, but they must play smart, not hard.