Jarvis Cocker and Johnny Greenwood in new Harry Potter movie

posthumus · **Joined:** Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:17 am **Posts:** 589

Didn't realize they were the band at the dance until after i saw it. The drummer is also from Radiohead and bassist from Pulp. Cool stuff, have to see it again now i know its them.

Borg166 · **Posted:** Wed Nov 23, 2005 4:49 am

I just saw Chamber of Secrets for the first time a few hours ago. I'm going to rent POA on Wendesday and then watch GOF on Thursday with my family.

I've been told that you notice some big difference between the second and third movies because of the new director.

Radcliffe · **Posted:** Wed Nov 23, 2005 5:17 am

[img][300:300]http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B00000IYKY.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg[/img]

Sketch · **Posted:** Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:09 am

haha, Rads.

MontyTheMongoose · **Posted:** Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:16 am

Radcliffe Wrote:

[img][300:300]http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B00000IYKY.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg[/img]

The Canadian chauvinism is quite large, here.

Especially when you consider that the band in the film is unnamed - though, yes, it is supposed to replicate the band of the novel (who Rowling did call the Weird Sisters (or some such)).

Further, when you consider that the Albertan band was trying to capitalise on this movie when they have no connection to it, and Warner Films made the effort to assure that no confusion would arise - forgoing naming the band, as it was in the book, when performance clearance could not be received - I would think that 'Cliffe, of all people, would call the band's members out on their bullshit.

Instead, he just laps it up.

Wyrd, no?

Modem · **Posted:** Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:38 am

Gar Finnvold Wrote:

Further, when you consider that the Albertan band was trying to capitalise on this movie

Still are, from what i've heard. They refused a $50,000 offer from Warner to go away and are pursuing the lawsuit.

shiv · **Posted:** Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:12 am

I hope their van crashes on the way to a gig.

hey look · **Posted:** Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:15 am

i dont get how they can take something they stole from Macbeth and claim it as their own, anyway.

HideousLump · **Posted:** Thu Nov 24, 2005 1:11 am

Borg166 Wrote:

I've been told that you notice some big difference between the second and third movies because of the new director.

'Tis true. The first two are just...there; Prisoner of Azkaban feels like there's actually someone behind the camera.

Twilightkid · **Posted:** Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:14 am

Still not enough for me to go see a Harry Potter movie....

heck, i havent seen any of the lord of the rings either!

Borg166 · **Posted:** Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:19 am

SweetSweetSquashanaut Wrote:

heck, i havent seen any of the lord of the rings either!

INSANITY

Twilightkid · **Posted:** Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:21 am

it's not that i don't want to see the and best buy having each double dvd on sale for 7.99 is super tempting... i just dont have the attention span for a 2.5 hour movie... let alone 3 of the.

i borrowed the first set from my friend a year or so ago, ad it sat ion my shelf for months..never found the motivation to watch...

guess, it wasnt meant to be.

Sketch · **Posted:** Thu Nov 24, 2005 8:46 am

If you get the extended version DVDs, they break the movie into two disc to make room for crazy audio tracks (four commentaries). That may work for you.

Jarvis Cocker and Johnny Greenwood in new Harry Potter movie

Who is online