Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 28 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1, 2

Print view

Previous topic :: Next topic 
Author Message
e-stone
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:56 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:31 pm
Posts: 11094
Location: moving up country
rparis74 Wrote:
it better not be an artist that is already on that list


that's exactly what i thought when i first saw the list....

BOO TODD! BOO!

_________________
Image

Back to top
 Profile  
 
Billzebub
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:33 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:26 pm
Posts: 6459
This confirms everything I think about the Stone Roses.
Back to top
 Profile  
 
Dusty Chalk
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:12 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 1:48 am
Posts: 7332
Location: Cloud 3.14159
That's odd -- usually if an artist already has a bit of a catalog, other entries in said catalog are what make up most of that list...I guess Stone Roses is different because...why, again?

_________________
I remain,
:-Peter, aka :-Dusty :-(halk

Back to top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 28 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Style by Midnight Phoenix & N.Design Studio
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.