Elvis Fu Wrote:
Did you bother to read that?
I did. I think we're interpreting it differently. See, I know these are two different things:
Quote:
Ellipsis: …
Three periods: ...
...but they sure do look the same. And to someone who isn't pedantic (OMG, I'm not as pedantic as someone else?!? Someone mark the calendar), three dots (or periods) will do.
Here's the important thing: on a typewriter, that's how you make an ellipsis, you hit the period -- or 'dot' -- key three times. I think this harkens back to Jewels' point in his first post. I come from the typewriter era, therefore my habits reflect that, and to him, he can tell my age by the fact that I do this.
Also, there is no ASCII character for ellipsis, and I tend to stay away from non-ASCII characters. As a graphics artist, I can see how you would feel more comfortable doing so, but I think it's asking too much to ask everyone else -- especially outside your field -- to do so.
Quote:
They aren't the same, and at no time does your article say that it is three periods.
Wikipedia Wrote:
Analogously, in printing and writing, the term refers to the row of three dots (…) ...
If one equates dots with periods, good enough for me.
Wikipedia Wrote:
Most programming languages require the ellipsis to be written as a series of periods; a single ellipsis character cannot be used.
See, they even use the word periods in this one. The three is implied (it was specified earlier).
I think we are arguing two different arguments. The article does say, in no uncertain terms (see above quote which you so conveniently extracted), that an ellipsis can be
represented by three periods -- the words 'three' and 'periods' are used in separate sentences, but they are both used and do not contradict each other.
I do, however, agree, that conceptually they are two different things.
I disagree, however, that people need to use an actual ellipsis character. That's just pedantic of you. This isn't typography, it's just an online forum.
PS I thought you had me on 'ignore'?