bort Wrote:
jsh Wrote:
interesting that there really hasn't been a change in price since the medium came into being. downward pressure on pricing generally hasn't taken hold at all. it's not shocking that the industry is in trouble when you consider the cost of selling a CD.
i agree. it's especially ...strange when you compare it to dvds. a hot dvd will sell for 20 bucks but after 8 months it'll drop to 5-10 bucks at target. a cd at 13 bucks will always be 13 bucks, even 8 years after release.
There are CDs that follow that same pattern, but it definitely doesn't work the same way. And a lot of old DVDs still sell for upwards of $20 especially if they weren't huge blockbusters and there's not a huge surplus of them lying around. Or at least they did until very, very recently when all the retail chains finally noticed huge drops in DVD sales.
I think DVDs only sold for $5-$10 as part of sale, not as a permanent drop in price, until very recently. Blu-Ray marks the death of DVD much more definitively than mp3s mark the death of CDs. But then most most major chain stores have already had massive markdown sales to unload most of their CD inventory, anyway. And Target never really devoted as much space to selling CDs as they have DVDs, either.
CDs aren't a bad format. Unfortunately, there could have been a higher quality physical-digital format, but there was never enough interest to support it. (DVD-Audio, SACD, etc.) Now people would either rather have nothing physical or go all out with physical media and get vinyl. Vinyl's neat and all, but there's nothing more inconvenient and cumbersome. It almost seems laughable to call CDs "portable" nowadays, but they really still are. A large CD collection can still be moved with relative ease compared to a large vinyl collection. And I actually like the size of the album artwork with a CD, but that's probably because I grew up with them.