Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Author Message
 Post subject: So mysogynistic!
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:18 pm 
Offline
Big in Australia
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 19821
Location: Chicago-ish
...bit so good, too!
Image

You ever notice just how damn mysogynisic this album is?
Just about every song.

_________________
Paul Caporino of M.O.T.O. Wrote:
I've recently noticed that all the unfortunate events in the lives of blues singers all seem to rhyme... I think all these tragedies could be avoided with a good rhyming dictionary.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:21 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
Todd, no man should ever call anything misogynstic.

Stop being a faggot.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:25 pm 
Offline
Big in Australia
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 19821
Location: Chicago-ish
Yail Bloor Wrote:
Todd, no man should ever call anything misogynstic.

Stop being a faggot.


My "sensitivity" helped me get laid A LOT in college. :D

And I never said it stopped me from loving the album.

_________________
Paul Caporino of M.O.T.O. Wrote:
I've recently noticed that all the unfortunate events in the lives of blues singers all seem to rhyme... I think all these tragedies could be avoided with a good rhyming dictionary.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:32 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
PimpTodd Wrote:
My sensitivity helped me get laid A LOT in college.


Did it?

Limp Todd Wrote:
And I never said it stopped me from loving the album.


I didnt either.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:09 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 5174
Hot Rocks, side one:
1. Time Is On My Side ("you'll come back, I know it")
2. Heart Of Stone ("Don't f*ck with me bitch")
3. Play With Fire ("Don't f*ck with me bitch")
4. (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction
5. As Tears Go By
6. Get Off My Cloud
7. Mother's Little Helper (making fun of housewives on valium)
8. 19th Nervous Breakdown (making fun of a woman having a nervous breakdown)
9. Paint It Black
10. Under My Thumb (titel says it all)

I've loved this since I first heard in back in grade 6... but my god, I put it on one day and realized it's just song after song of "don't f*ck with me bitch". But then part of me says Nah, it's just sensitive little Mick being all heart broken and 'pushed around' by women and then trying to play it tough. I dunno.

Anyone ever read "The Sex Revolts"? Great book about gender stuff in Rock music. My fav part is the intro where the authors (a man and a woman) say that even though they're pointing out the sexism in the music they still LOVE the Stones, Stranglers, etc...

I used to love playing "Peaches" when I'd DJ. So good. But then of course I'd follow it up with "Oh Bondage, Up Yours!" or some Joan Jett.

Awwwe yeah.
:rockbanana: :rockbanana: :rockbanana:


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:23 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
Put yourself in the Stones or most any other huge rock band's place. Even if they love and respect their spouse and mum, 99% of all the women these people encounter on the road are willing to do basically subhuman things just to be near famous people.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:26 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 5174
Yail Bloor Wrote:
Put yourself in the Stones or most any other huge rock band's place. Even if they love and respect their spouse and mum, 99% of all the women these people encounter on the road are willing to do basically subhuman things just to be near famous people.


Heh. Yeah could be part of it.

It's probably more the fact that they were so inflenced by old American Blues: Robert Johnson "I'm gonna kill that woman" type stuff.

<-- loves Johnson & other old blues.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:28 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:59 pm
Posts: 24583
Location: On the gas and tappin' ass
A simpler time... when beat-a-bitch was fair gme.

_________________
[quote="Bloor"]He's either done too much and should stay out of the economy, done too little because unemployment isn't 0%, is a dumb ingrate who wasn't ready for the job or a brilliant mastermind who has taken over all aspects of our lives and is transforming us into a Stalinist style penal economy where Christian Whites are fed into meat grinders. Very confusing[/quote]


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:38 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
Cap'n Squirrgle Wrote:
A simpler time... when beat-a-bitch was fair gme.


when men were men--and women worked on their shoulder blades.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So mysogynistic!
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:52 pm 
Offline
Post-Breakup Solo Project
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:04 pm
Posts: 3347
Location: Balls Deep
PimpTodd Wrote:
...but so good, too!
Image


In my all-time Top 10. Seriously.

Quote:
You ever notice just how damn mysogynisic this album is?
Just about every song.


Fieger always said the album was written from the point of view of a 13 year old boy...others have called it the 1st concept album about teen lust.

I just think it's full of catchy tunes.

Quote:
My "sensitivity" helped me get laid A LOT in college.


Yeah, but when you have to apologize directly afterward, it kinda spoils the fun.
:P


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:55 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 12368
Location: last place I looked
Just to set the record straight: the Stranglers are misogynistic, side one of Hot Rocks isn't.

Lyrics that catalogue the normal push/pull of a human relationship don't point to misogyny, they point to an understanding of base human nature. In any sexual relationship, 9 out of 10 times one person ends up calling the shots - that's the reality the early Stones tapped into. That's what set them apart from the Beatles so brilliantly - they didn't want to hold your hand, you wanted to hold their hand. Now, if Polly had chosen "Stupid Girl" as her example, I would've had to agree with her - but then life as we know it may have come to an end.



Oh, and Pop Todd - surely you remember the anti-misogyny shitstorm that came down when Get The Knack was first released? The T-shirts emblazoned with "Nuke the Knack" - even a gentlemanly band like Squeeze wore them on stage.

Part of the Knack's failure to follow-up that debut was due to Feiger's unapologetic stance towards that misogyny. When he titled the second album But The Little Girls Understand he pretty much creeped out an entire nation. Well, that and the songs sucked too.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:02 pm 
Offline
Post-Breakup Solo Project
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:04 pm
Posts: 3347
Location: Balls Deep
Radcliffe Wrote:
Part of the Knack's failure to follow-up that debut was due to Feiger's unapologetic stance towards that misogyny. When he titled the second album But The Little Girls Understand he pretty much creeped out an entire nation.


Yep. I've got the DVD "Getting The Knack", & there's interview clips in there with the other members of the band saying things to the effect of "Geez...come on...really?" in relation to the even "edgier" lyrics of "...But The Little Girls Understand".

When yer own bandmates start getting skeeved out, somethin's goofy.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:08 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 7979
Quote:
That's what set them apart from the Beatles so brilliantly - they didn't want to hold your hand, they wanted to burn your town.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:58 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 5174
Radcliffe Wrote:
Just to set the record straight: the Stranglers are misogynistic, side one of Hot Rocks isn't.

Lyrics that catalogue the normal push/pull of a human relationship don't point to misogyny, they point to an understanding of base human nature. In any sexual relationship, 9 out of 10 times one person ends up calling the shots - that's the reality the early Stones tapped into. That's what set them apart from the Beatles so brilliantly - they didn't want to hold your hand, you wanted to hold their hand. Now, if Polly had chosen "Stupid Girl" as her example, I would've had to agree with her - but then life as we know it may have come to an end.


Yeah, yeah, you're right--sort of. I guess it was an old thought of mine. Little of it is outright woman-hating... but you've got to admit there's a lot of venom in there---most of it directed at women. I guess "Mother's Little Helper" is more of a social commentary.

Guess life as we know it is going to come to an end. (or a half end). :shock:


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:00 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:04 pm
Posts: 9783
Location: NOLA
are we sure Poptodd isn't some sort of bot?

_________________
I tried to find somebody of that sort that I could like that nobody else did - because everybody would adopt his group, and his group would be _it_; someone weird like Captain Beefheart. It's no different now - people trying to outdo ! each other in extremes. There are people who like X, and there are people who say X are wimps; they like Black Flag.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:00 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 5174
Z Wrote:
Quote:
That's what set them apart from the Beatles so brilliantly - they didn't want to hold your hand, they wanted to burn your town.


This is why I love the Stones sooooo much better than the frickin' Beatles (the wrath of ayah on my head in 5... 4... 3... 2...)


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:01 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:04 pm
Posts: 9783
Location: NOLA
pollysix Wrote:
Z Wrote:
Quote:
That's what set them apart from the Beatles so brilliantly - they didn't want to hold your hand, they wanted to burn your town.


This is why I love the Stones sooooo much better than the frickin' Beatles (the wrath of ayah on my head in 5... 4... 3... 2...)


I think this view of these two bands is really unfair. I think at their time what the Beatles were selling was every bit as dangerous as the Stones.

_________________
I tried to find somebody of that sort that I could like that nobody else did - because everybody would adopt his group, and his group would be _it_; someone weird like Captain Beefheart. It's no different now - people trying to outdo ! each other in extremes. There are people who like X, and there are people who say X are wimps; they like Black Flag.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:09 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 5174
Phyllis Montana Leblanc Wrote:
pollysix Wrote:
Z Wrote:
Quote:
That's what set them apart from the Beatles so brilliantly - they didn't want to hold your hand, they wanted to burn your town.


This is why I love the Stones sooooo much better than the frickin' Beatles (the wrath of ayah on my head in 5... 4... 3... 2...)


I think this view of these two bands is really unfair. I think at their time what the Beatles were selling was every bit as dangerous as the Stones.


I'm being bl&wh about it. I'm just talking initial impressions--i.e. when I was in High School. Once I discovered stuff like: "I want you (she's so heavy)" and "Tomorrow never knows" I realized this.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:12 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 12368
Location: last place I looked
Phyllis Montana Leblanc Wrote:
pollysix Wrote:
Z Wrote:
Quote:
That's what set them apart from the Beatles so brilliantly - they didn't want to hold your hand, they wanted to burn your town.


This is why I love the Stones sooooo much better than the frickin' Beatles (the wrath of ayah on my head in 5... 4... 3... 2...)


I think this view of these two bands is really unfair. I think at their time what the Beatles were selling was every bit as dangerous as the Stones.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but you're wrong. The Beatles were mostly accepted by parents - they were kind of cute in their matching suits, after all. But the Stones were a whole other level of menace. You'll just have to believe me on this one.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:45 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:03 pm
Posts: 6402
ayah Wrote:
the Stones were a whole other level of menace. You'll just have to believe him on this one.


and polly, first teh gheys and now the beatles.
you're in big trouble girl.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:52 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
ayah Wrote:
ayah Wrote:
the Stones were a whole other level of menace. You'll just have to believe him on this one.




the stones were only dangerous in that far away hollywood/rebel without a cause way.

The Beatles were dangerous because they were the agents of Satan (indeed--bigger than Jesus), Dope, and the Anti-War movement.

And even if they werent they were held accountable as such.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:20 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 5174
Yail Bloor Wrote:
ayah Wrote:
ayah Wrote:
the Stones were a whole other level of menace. You'll just have to believe him on this one.




the stones were only dangerous in that far away hollywood/rebel without a cause way.

The Beatles were dangerous because they were the agents of Satan (indeed--bigger than Jesus), Dope, and the Anti-War movement.

And even if they werent they were held accountable as such.


As if the Stones had nothing to do with Mr. Satan.

Image


(that said, gosh do they ever look like cute little preschool boys on that cover)


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:22 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:56 am
Posts: 5174
ayah Wrote:
ayah Wrote:
the Stones were a whole other level of menace. You'll just have to believe him on this one.


and polly, first teh gheys and now the beatles.
you're in big trouble girl.


I just like me some bad boys...



...and ponces



....and bad girls


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 7:06 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:04 pm
Posts: 9783
Location: NOLA
Yail Bloor Wrote:
ayah Wrote:
ayah Wrote:
the Stones were a whole other level of menace. You'll just have to believe him on this one.




the stones were only dangerous in that far away hollywood/rebel without a cause way.

The Beatles were dangerous because they were the agents of Satan (indeed--bigger than Jesus), Dope, and the Anti-War movement.

And even if they werent they were held accountable as such.


I was gonna argue my point further but you boiled it down.

_________________
I tried to find somebody of that sort that I could like that nobody else did - because everybody would adopt his group, and his group would be _it_; someone weird like Captain Beefheart. It's no different now - people trying to outdo ! each other in extremes. There are people who like X, and there are people who say X are wimps; they like Black Flag.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:15 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:26 pm
Posts: 6459
Radcliffe Wrote:
Phyllis Montana Leblanc Wrote:
pollysix Wrote:
Z Wrote:
Quote:
That's what set them apart from the Beatles so brilliantly - they didn't want to hold your hand, they wanted to burn your town.


This is why I love the Stones sooooo much better than the frickin' Beatles (the wrath of ayah on my head in 5... 4... 3... 2...)


I think this view of these two bands is really unfair. I think at their time what the Beatles were selling was every bit as dangerous as the Stones.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but you're wrong. The Beatles were mostly accepted by parents - they were kind of cute in their matching suits, after all. But the Stones were a whole other level of menace. You'll just have to believe me on this one.



...and then there were The Pretty Things.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Style by Midnight Phoenix & N.Design Studio
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.