pollysix Wrote:
Jim Clark Wrote:
Musical genius? Doubtful. The guy can't read music and I think that fact alone would immediately rule out any run at a genius label.
Right. So none of the old blues or jazz masters were geniuses? Guess Brian Eno isn't either? That's a ridiculous statement. There are plenty of brilliant musicians out there who play and write totally by ear. Don't be a classical snob.
Right, lots of Adam Ant fans are classical snobs. Whoa K.
Not many folks are going to compare Adam Ant to old blues and jazz masters either. Then again I've not heard a lot of sentences with Brian Eno and Adam Ant used together. Exactly what instrument has the man mastered or at least shown above average talent with? What songs has the man done on his own that would demonstrate musical genius?
Listen, there aren't too many people that enjoy Adam Ant more than me. Not only do I have every single album released, I have one that is owned by Sony (
Persuasion) that never saw the light of day and more bootlegs than you could listen to in a week. The point isn't snobery, it's giving the musical credit where it's due and even Adam gives that credit to Marco Pirroni. Even that's not entirely true as the whole Burundi beat was the idea of Malcolm McLaren and it's that concept coupled with the glam that elevated (or sunk depending on your pov) Adam and the Ants out of the art school S&M punk thing that they had going on.
Pretty sure that Gary Glitter used 2 drummers as well. While I've never been a big fan of that perv, Adam was. That accounts for a lot of the showmanship. Look, the guy had a lot of talent and yes there is musical talent there but genius isn't the best way to describe it whether you think it's ridiculous or not!
