NMR: Moore vs. Wolf Blitzer

catswilleatyou · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:33 am

scroll down for video

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Michael_M ... _0709.html

this one fired me up

splates · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:02 am

comes off as a fat tosser

i mean in principle his points are right RE:US healthcare, but that doesnt mean they shouldnt be criticized and the medical correspondent raised some valid criticisms of his points

splates · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:03 am

basically he is his own worst enemy

jewels santana · **Joined:** Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:36 pm **Posts:** 10198

splates Wrote:

basically he is his own worst enemy

sad but true.

splates · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:10 am

Juelz, Dip Dip
Santana, Set, Set

catswilleatyou · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:11 am

splates Wrote:

comes off as a fat tosser

i mean in principle his points are right RE:US healthcare, but that doesnt mean they shouldnt be criticized and the medical correspondent raised some valid criticisms of his points

no... the medical correspondent made an ad for the prescription drug companies and disguised it as a valid criticism...to be played right before they interview him.. so that he looks like a fat tosser...

uomo bianco · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:37 pm

catswilleatyou Wrote:

splates Wrote:

comes off as a fat tosser

i mean in principle his points are right RE:US healthcare, but that doesnt mean they shouldnt be criticized and the medical correspondent raised some valid criticisms of his points

no... the medical correspondent made an ad for the prescription drug companies and disguised it as a valid criticism...to be played right before they interview him.. so that he looks like a fat tosser...

no, he really looks like a "fat tosser" (because that is what he is).

Finch Platte · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:54 pm

Moore is livid. And deservedly so.

I love it. Thanks for the link.

Hegel · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:05 pm

I love it how Moore is so upset that the report from CNN was "unbelievably biased". That's a little "pot calling the kettle fat tosser" if you ask me.

If he hadn't gotten so outraged and on a huge tangent that made him seem unreasonable and almost paranoid schizophrenic, his points would have been much more well-received.

I think he realized it when he started talking about Hillary Clinton and actually started focussing on the questions. He seemed to calm down and come back to reality there.

catswilleatyou · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:13 pm

I don't think he looks unreasonable or schizophrenic for being that outraged... I think a lot more people should be as outraged as him.

Hegel · **Posted:** Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:19 pm

If he was outraged about something that related to his movie, ok. But, he got all bent out of shape because wolf blitzer didn't apologize to him because they stated that they didn't subscribe whole-heartedly to F/9-11 and started rambling about WMDs and Quagmires. He appeared all over the place and in need of some ritalin or some other attention focussing drug, IMO.

He came off, to me, as some self-righteous assbag with an unrealistic sense of entitlement. I just find the hypocrisy in his outrage about "bias" almost too hard to move past and pretty much laughable. There is hardly anything more overtly biased in "documentary" film than a Michael Moore piece--again, IMO.

NMR: Moore vs. Wolf Blitzer

Who is online