katie, a princess Wrote:
i generally can't throw them out until i've listened either. i generally give stuff a passive listen and then an aggressive one. the passive one is a good indicator because i'll be doing other crap and if something sticks out in the back of my mind like, "haven't i already listened to this song? oh, its just a really repetitive song" or "my foot is tapping, how strange" etc., then i put it in a pile to listen to aggressively later in the day, when i can pay attention more (or toss it out if i'm just like, this sux).
i listen to stuff that i get from reputable publicists first (for example, for my personal tastes, i know ill like whatever XYZ puts in front of me more than i will what ABC puts in front of me).
another good thing to do is organize your stacks by order release date. its way more important for me to listen to this here langhorne slim disc than it is for me to listen to oneida fink (which is out in late august). but then again, for my more featury bands, if my lead time is a month or two months, and a cd comes out in negative one week, then ill listen to the band that fits my lead time best.
priorities, man. look at your lead time, the star power, the publicists, etc. then let your ear take over once you're organized. and don't be afraid to just let some stuff go. i can't let this awful craig morgan disc just mold on my desk...
I'm a little different than you in that rock criticism/feature writing isn't an active part of my life any more. But I'm still on some mailing lists from my stints w/ CMJ and AltPress and get like 3-6 discs a week.
I guess my question was more, how do you decide whether something is a keeper, a crapper or a maybe. I find the three-song rule is the most practical way to do things, unless it's an established artist I know I'll have plenty of time to.
My problem these days is with no job motivation to find the next newsworthy act, it's hard to push myself to sift through the crap in search of a few gems.