newsflash: they were famous well before you heard of them.

Thanks fuckface. I meant to the public at large, not your pasty face soy latte sippin Williamsburg friends.

brooklyn, yo.

As an old "friend of ours", AAGGHH would say..."BAM!".

still the best parody:

[img][650:512]http://www.marriedtothesea.com/100606/im-in-ur-mtns.gif[/img]

really now, that was just "snippy for snippy's sake."

And...?

And then there's "new thread for new thread's sake," "atl in-joke for atl in-joke's sake"... all the favorites are here!

I'M ANGRY ABOUT YOGURT

Actually, not really. I think that the "watching you fap" thread has the most responses on the board, and evn though you probably get all your news from alternet Haq, I figured some of us who still read *gasp* mainstream media news magazines would be interested in seeing a phenomenon that we know mainly from the board appear in a magazine such as Time.

Doesn't need a new thread. Link it in the fapping thread.

[insert obvious reading comprehension jab]

[hi5 jls]

I wasn't aware that starting a new thread related to another thread was such an egregious offense.

I guess I'll just start another Shrimpboat thread, you nonce.

ad hominem minus 10 dexterity

You're close, counselor, but I'm going to allow it. The new thread for new thread's sake isn't really a valid criticism, given that new and superfluous threads are started daily.

So, we get to the ATL in-joke criticism, which is what I was responding to. It's neither and in-joke nor and ATL joke, so it's obviously not an ATL in-joke for the sake of it.

Good try though, I can rebut you all night.

Oh, that's what you were responding to? Right up there, where you talked about the fap thread? That's some clever obfuscation.

I jus' seent sum big werds.

Here's a little bit of ad hominem obfuscation, with some armchair psychology thrown in.

You are neither half as clever as you think you are, nor even remotely correct or adept in your criticism. You try to keep a set of rules for criticism of me and a set for the rest of people, probably because you are threatened by me in some fashion.

let me put it in plain english then: you didn't respond to the atl-speak thing at all. you made that up to sound like you won. like you always do.

Well, you CAN stomp 12 foot tall trees. That's a little threatening.

prain engrish?

I lumped the two together, and I would guess that most here knew what I meant and that you were being an ass, like you always are.

I guess I don't QUITE get your bizarre need to engage me in arguments and then claim that I claim I won.

You were wrong on both counts, and it was/is obvious.

EDIT: also, the original charge was atl in-joke, not atl speak. So, way to change the argument to fit your views on it.

god, will you two just fuck each other and get it over with?

yes