Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:04 pm 
Offline
Natural Harvester
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 23083
Location: Portland, OR
Yail Bloor Wrote:
shmoo Wrote:
So, nobody has yet posted Image ?

Weird.


It and Let It Bleed are hovering over this thread saying "Good, but not as good as me"


this.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:04 pm 
Offline
TEH MACHINE
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Posts: 16684
Location: Jiggin' for Yanks
Dalen Wrote:
how many of the releases posted in this thread are stone cold classics though? maybe 5?


How many have you heard?

_________________
All I can say is, go on and bleed.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:09 pm 
Offline
Natural Harvester
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 23083
Location: Portland, OR
DumpJack Wrote:
Dalen Wrote:
how many of the releases posted in this thread are stone cold classics though? maybe 5?


How many have you heard?


a large percentage. i'd say 80%.

i do want to hear this though....

Image


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:12 pm 
Offline
Natural Harvester
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 23083
Location: Portland, OR
and this

Image


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:18 pm 
Offline
TEH MACHINE
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Posts: 16684
Location: Jiggin' for Yanks
I just don't get you, man.

_________________
All I can say is, go on and bleed.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:24 pm 
Offline
A True Aristocrat of Freedom

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:46 am
Posts: 22121
Location: a worn-out debauchee and drivelling sot
Dalen Wrote:
DumpJack Wrote:
Dalen Wrote:
how many of the releases posted in this thread are stone cold classics though? maybe 5?


How many have you heard?


a large percentage. i'd say 80%.

i do want to hear this though....

Image

I want to hear this and that Hoyt Axton, but agree with Dalen on the lack of stone cold classics.

_________________
Throughout his life, from childhood until death, he was beset by severe swings of mood. His depressions frequently encouraged, and were exacerbated by, his various vices. His character mixed a superficial Enlightenment sensibility for reason and taste with a genuine and somewhat Romantic love of the sublime and a propensity for occasionally puerile whimsy.
harry Wrote:
I understand that you, of all people, know this crisis and, in your own way, are working to address it. You, the madras-pantsed julip-sipping Southern cracker and me, the oldman hippie California fruit cake are brothers in the struggle to save our country.

FT Wrote:
LooGAR (the straw that stirs the drink)


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:24 pm 
Offline
Natural Harvester
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 23083
Location: Portland, OR
because i question the percentage of stone cold classic releases during 1969? dude, don't get me wrong, there are some really good records in here, but as an overall year...how many hit my turntable or stereo often....not many.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:37 pm 
Offline
TEH MACHINE
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Posts: 16684
Location: Jiggin' for Yanks
Quick scan of the thread and I'd have no problem calling any of these stone cold classics

Abbey Road
Let it Bleed
The Velvet Underground
Everybody Knows This is Nowhere
The Band
Bayou Country
Willie and the Poor Boys
Green River
Johnny Cash at San Quentin
Bitches Brew
Aoxomoxoa
Pretties for You
Kick Out the Jams
The Stooges
Trout Mask Replica
In a Silent Way
From Elvis to Memphis
Stand
Dusty in Memphis

_________________
All I can say is, go on and bleed.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:48 pm 
Offline
TEH MACHINE
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Posts: 16684
Location: Jiggin' for Yanks
Dalen Wrote:
because i question the percentage of stone cold classic releases during 1969? dude, don't get me wrong, there are some really good records in here, but as an overall year...how many hit my turntable or stereo often....not many.


I don't really know if your statements in these threads are serious or just rabble-rousing because saying there are 5 classic albums in 1969 just seems inflammatory; You do also strongly suggest that most of the time you focus on new releases so I have to wonder that, statistically speaking, how much time could you allocate to any of these '69 albums? Even classic albums in your collection must get bumped off the queue on a regular basis because there are only so many hours in a day one can be actually listening to music.

_________________
All I can say is, go on and bleed.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:05 am 
Offline
Natural Harvester
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 23083
Location: Portland, OR
while i definitely focus on listening/discovering new music all day during work hours, my commute home and the night time hours are when i usually pull out older releases/vinyl/turntable/stereo stuff. i spend a lot of time with music, every day. thankfully. plus, i'm freakin' 40 now dude. i've spent plenty of time with records from 1969.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:07 am 
Offline
Natural Harvester
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 23083
Location: Portland, OR
DumpJack Wrote:
Quick scan of the thread and I'd have no problem calling any of these stone cold classics

Abbey Road
Let it Bleed
Bitches Brew
The Stooges
Dusty in Memphis


i would break it down to these.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:13 am 
Offline
TEH MACHINE
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Posts: 16684
Location: Jiggin' for Yanks
I can't take any great '69 list seriously without CCR.

_________________
All I can say is, go on and bleed.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
It blows my mind that they released three records that good in one fucking year.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:28 am 
Offline
TEH MACHINE
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Posts: 16684
Location: Jiggin' for Yanks
Yail Bloor Wrote:
It blows my mind that they released three records that good in one fucking year.


Exactly.

_________________
All I can say is, go on and bleed.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:30 am 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 5289
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Dalen Wrote:
plus, i'm freakin' 40 now dude. i've spent plenty of time with records from 1969.


I think it would be interesting for one of the statisticians here to figure out the breakdown, by year, of songs in never-ending rotation on, say, 10 major market Classic Rock radio stations.

All these type discussions are, by simple necessity, individual opinion and bias. Having said that, and please don't take it as inflammatory or an attempt to start shit, but this quote made me laugh my ass off.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:35 am 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:43 pm
Posts: 5428
Location: back in portland
Imagine living in a world where you dont think Stand! is a classic.

_________________
http://inawhiteroom.wordpress.com


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:36 am 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
Or The Band

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:37 am 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:43 pm
Posts: 5428
Location: back in portland
also did no one even mention In The Court of the Crimson King? that might actually be my favorite record.

_________________
http://inawhiteroom.wordpress.com


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:37 am 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:43 pm
Posts: 5428
Location: back in portland
the first two Led albums

_________________
http://inawhiteroom.wordpress.com


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:04 am 
Offline
Natural Harvester
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 23083
Location: Portland, OR
DumpJack Wrote:
I can't take any great '69 list seriously without CCR.


Bayou Country was drilled into my head as a child. Green River if anything.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:12 am 
Offline
Natural Harvester
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 23083
Location: Portland, OR
contradiction Wrote:
also did no one even mention In The Court of the Crimson King? that might actually be my favorite record.


you should probably read the thread.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:23 am 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:16 am
Posts: 5271
Location: Right behind you! Boo!
DumpJack Wrote:
Quick scan of the thread and I'd have no problem calling any of these stone cold classics

Abbey Road
Let it Bleed
The Velvet Underground
Everybody Knows This is Nowhere
The Band
Bayou Country
Willie and the Poor Boys
Green River
Johnny Cash at San Quentin
Bitches Brew
Aoxomoxoa
Pretties for You
Kick Out the Jams
The Stooges
Trout Mask Replica
In a Silent Way
From Elvis to Memphis
Stand
Dusty in Memphis


Yeah, that's a pretty good list. But I would never say the phrase "stone cold classics".

_________________
Half-insane and half-god


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:25 am 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:43 pm
Posts: 5428
Location: back in portland
Dalen Wrote:
contradiction Wrote:
also did no one even mention In The Court of the Crimson King? that might actually be my favorite record.


you should probably read the thread.


my bad, i just meant since the DJ post on this page. I was cooking at the time.

_________________
http://inawhiteroom.wordpress.com


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:00 am 
Offline
May contain Jesus.
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:43 pm
Posts: 12275
Location: The Already, Not Yet.
Image
not my links.
Code:
Part 1- http://tinyurl.com/4kbt37u

Code:
Part 2- http://tinyurl.com/4ohfyay


Just because I think its interesting. 2nd solo George Harrison record. Completely orchestrated on a Moog, and probably some hallucinogenics. Also, this was the last recording to be released on Zapple Records.

Also:
Quote:
Synthesist Bernie Krause later pursued legal action against Harrison, claiming that "No Time Or Space" (side two of the original vinyl album; track one of the CD) was essentially a recording of him demonstrating the Moog III to Harrison (this is detailed in Krause's book Into A Wild Sanctuary.) Krause also claimed that the demonstration was recorded without his knowledge or consent. Krause's name was originally credited on the front cover under Harrison's cover credit, but it was painted over at his insistence. Despite this, the words "Assisted by Bernie Krause" can still be read under the slver paint on the original LP pressings.



Image
also not my link
Code:
http://tinyurl.com/4j7njez


Fun fact: Robbie Basho was born in Baltimore.



Wanted to add this, but couldn't find a link.
Quote:
Created on the Buchla Electronic Music System and recorded in quadraphonic sound, “Touch” by Morton Subotnick, is another early electronic music masterpiece by the pioneering American composer. Before the age of microcomputers and digital synthesizers, Subotnick was making engaging works of purely electronic sounds in a style somewhat similar to his better known European colleagues such as Karlheinz Stockhausen. While not quite as frenetic as Stockhausen’s “Kontakte”, nor perhaps as complex as Subotnick’s earlier work for the Buchla, “Silver Apples of the Moon,” “Touch” still clearly challenges the preconceptions of what was considered music at the dawn of the Information Age. Like “Silver Apples,” “Touch” was composed with the LP record in mind, as it was divided into two parts, one for each side of the album, and was always primarily meant to be listened to as a stereo recording rather than performed live. With the advent of full digital technology such early compositions might seem to some as almost primitive, but this would be an erroneous assumption, as these earlier works were often based on a better understanding of music then much of what passes for electronica today.

But you can stream it here:

http://www.archive.org/details/G_SUB_MOR_01


Image
Again, not my link
Code:
http://tinyurl.com/6y8qctm

_________________
It's Baltimore, gentlemen; the gods will not save you.

Baltimore is a town where everyone thinks they’re normal, but they’re totally insane. In New York, they think they’re crazy, but they’re perfectly normal. --John Waters
Image


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: You Should Hear This: 1969
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:07 pm 
Offline
Gayford R. Tincture

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 13644
Location: The Weapon Store
Nice, Rabbit, I haven't heard any of those, but I've definitely wanted to check out that David Axelrod album for a while.

And that Robbie Basho album reminds me...

Image
John Fahey - The Yellow Princess

Kind of surprised that we've made it this far without this album being mentioned, but then people have tended to lean toward the more obscure stuff in these threads. Also 1969 just has a ton of great albums, and arguably more "stone cold classics" (ugh) than just about any year.

This may be my favorite Fahey, but it's really hard to pick between all of his '60s albums. I like this one because he really stretches out on it and makes his playing style even more personal and unique. I don't really like most of his later "experimental" stuff, but I think this is the perfect middle ground between that and his earlier, more straightforward stuff. It's probably a good place to start with him, too.


OK, I should let this thread be, but here's one more artist who put out three great albums in 1969:

Image Image

Pharoah Sanders
Izipho Zam
Karma
Jewels of Thought


Sanders also recorded Summun Bukmun Umyun (Deaf Dumb Blind), also a great album with a similar sound, this same year and released it in 1970.

I've actually never heard Izipho Zam, but I posted it here because it's at least as highly regarded as Jewels of Thought, if not more, and it's relevant to this period of Sander's music, which is his most prolific and arguably his best. I just downloaded it yesterday, and I'll share the link I used below.

For those who don't know, this is, I think, spiritual jazz, a little bit free, a little bit fusion-y. There are some discordant moments and some skronky moments, but it's mostly really pretty. I think the main hurdle to get over for most people who are new to this is actually the vocals. There is singing on a lot of this stuff, and it's a bizarre kind of semi-yodeling that can be really off-putting - or it was to me, anyway - at first. If you can get past that, there's some really incredible music here, if it does seem a little on the New-Age-y side. It has a certain grit to it, enough of an edge to keep it from seeming like a bunch of jazz-hippy garbage, and the spiritual elements hearken back to Coltrane's latter albums, many of which Sanders played on.

And here's Izipho Zam, for anyone interested:
Code:
http://www.mediafire.com/?7zdiddhmz2o


Back to top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Style by Midnight Phoenix & N.Design Studio
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.