I think someone should digitally alter that video for Thriller where he's dancing around that girl in the Amish uniform, so that the face is the same as the face of MJ's accuser.

please. it's jesus juice.

lol, somehow I knew that was coming! Oh well, if you can't beat them, join them!

I just can't wait to watch the E! reinactment tonight when I get home from work!

Anyone else think their coverage was totally lame?

i totally saw that one. you're so right.

I knew things were shady when Jermaine and Tito were allowed on the jury.

Steve

I found this odd as well. I figured it would be the only think they found him guilty of.

Jacko should've got at least a couple years in the slam for impersonating an officer.

I'm looking forward to tonite's "Michael Jackson Puppet Theatre" on MSNBC's Countdown, myself.

Not surprised in the verdict at ALL...the prosecution didn't do a very good job of proving he did it, far as I could tell.

Do I think he's been up to some creepy shit in the past? Oh, yeah. But that's not what this case was about.

Jackson 2, Sneddon 0................. time for your candidate to make new friends.

Listening to Sharpton on CNN. After he claims MJ was "lynched" by the media, he fucking dodges the best question of all:

"Rev Sharpton, do you think Michael Jackson should continue to sleep in the same bed as young boys?"

I still wouldn't want him to be my son's scoutmaster.

Okay, so Michael Jackson is free. Can we return our focus back to Tibet?

nope...now it's katie holmes.



http://freekatie.net/

Anyone going to Chuck E. Cheese to celebrate?

This is true the world over. Not a peculiarly American thing.

i'm glad that this sick bastard got off. if there isn't evidence to convict then he needs to be in a hospital if anything, not a jail.

Pedophiles of the world, rejoice!

Did anyone seriously think he was actually going to be found guilty?

Yeah, actually, every time I passed by CNN (it runs in the lobby of my building, on the way to the soda fountain), they were extemporizing...the analysis went, usually when it takes a long time to reach a verdict, the jury comes back with a mixed bag of guilty and not guilty rulings.

So, not just me -- top notch analysts were wrong, too.

I don't think I would agree they are necessarily "top notch". I think that in most cases, they are just industry people who are either pretty or loud enough to get on TV.

I never thought he would be convicted (unless the charge was "felony freak" or the lesser included charge of "misdemeanor freak").

The "evidence" was crap - all came down to credibility. And since Jacko didn't testify, it ultimately came down to the ACCUSER's credibility. And he had none.

Jacko is a sick fuck, but that is not against the law... yet. If good evidence is found, or a credible accuser comes forward, he can be put away. THANK GOD it is not just up to us assholes whether a man goes to jail or not.

Yeah, it sucks that the kid may have been abused but not believed because of his family's prior behavior. But should Jacko be put away just because of HIS prior behavior? I think we all believe that he's capable of molesting a kid, but being capable of committing a crime is not the same as actually COMMITTING a crime.

And we all know that celebrities don't go to jail... except Martha. And that was just a PR thing.

What jewels, e-stone, and old KY said.

well, yeah that sucks. We have a lot other friends as well. And not for nothing, when your attorney has to announce after a verdict like this that you will "No Longer be sharing your bed with little boys" I think you should be locked up somewehere. Like chase said, maybe in the hospital.