I can delete the dups for now - pretty soon the poster of an album will be able to edit, but probably not delete. I pretty coded all of the functionality myself, so I just haven't got around to several things. Shiv, what album needs to go?

I deleted the Sticky Fingers dup, but unfortunately it was the one with 4 votes instead of 2 (had to guess cause they had the same timestamp), so if you rated it before, your rating may have disappeared.

there are two stones sticky fingers & two lidell multiply

Elvis is a smart man. The obvious button staring in my face is the one I never think of.

I also mispelled Beggars Banquet.

I'm having a hard time coping with the new technology.

wow, there went an hour of my day...
excellent work haq

Yeah, this is loads of fun. I like that it was a surprise.

Steve

Nicely done, Aaron.

Gegger's Banquet?

BAHAHAHAHA!!

*points at Yail*

[Lebowski]YOU FUCKED IT UP!![/Lebowski]

"It was the best of times, it was the BLURST of times?! Stupid monkey!"

I just went bucky on some Wire and Smiths albums, and also added some 10 votes to all those Stones albums.



I am sure I will be called out, because for right now I am only voting for albums I love and albums I hate.

i'm not ranking anything that i haven't heard in its entirety.

Sorting, bitches.

To commemorate this feature, I give you The worst albums of 2005.

Haq - I just entered Frank Black's Dog In The Sand as 2003 instead of 2001. I'm pretty sure this'll mess up the entire chart feature.

Noice! And a couple of those "worst" albums are ones I'm the only one to rate (so far) - and I like the albums. I guess I should go the route of Frosting Warfare and just give everything a 10.

How about having only one "Rate" button at the bottom of the page so that multiple albums can be rated at once?

Another possibly useful feature would be a page that displays x amount of albums which are unreated by you, so you can rate albums they don't care to look for on their own.

that jamie lidell multiply that paladisiac already mentioned.

Also, there's a bunch of weak shit on there. People are throwing out 10's like they're on tap.

And, why is 1 the lowest? I know its a 1-10 scale, but I feel there should be a zero. Meaning, you play this album at a party, and I either take it out, or get up and leave.

Dave Matthews, The Stooges, Patti Smith and latter day Radiohead come to mind.

The solution to "weak shit" is to rank it low yourself. Everyone has a vote. It'll even out after a few days.

i think a bunch of people are starting ranking their favorites (10s) first. i did that. i ended up taking a 10 back cuz i thought it a bit much.

Intial ratings will be favorable because it's an "our favorites" setup. That's what the whole thing is for. Future ratings will be reactionary, with people saying "that's not a fucking 10, you twerp" and ratings will even out.

Only time that won't work is when it's an album that only a few people know and aren't sure how to rate it. Then maybe people should give it a 6 or something, just to err slightly positive.

I gave my 10 favorite albums a "10", and that's it. I'm for handing out 10s to your favorites (On a 1-10 scale, why limit yourself to only using 2-9?), but I'm also for using some restraint.

Of my 103 ratings so far, I'm averaging a 6, really doe. I'll take that.

If it were a 1 to 20 scale, there'd be a lot more leeway. But this will work okay once more ratings pile up.