Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:30 am 
Offline
frostingspoon

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:07 pm
Posts: 12618
johnny depp's voice in this annoys me just from the previews.

_________________
dumpjack: "I haven't liked anything he's done so far, but I'll still listen."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:11 am 
Offline
Winona Ryder wears my t-shirt on TV

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:10 pm
Posts: 2532
Location: Cleveland, OH
rparis74 Wrote:
johnny depp's voice in this annoys me just from the previews.


You will feel the exact opposite once you see Johnny Depp within the context of the movie. The trailer does not do his performance justice at all.

Also, this is coming from someone who had the same opinion as you about Depp in the trailer. The cut and paste job essentially killed his character.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:42 am 
Offline
frostingspoon

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:07 pm
Posts: 12618
hmm - thanks for the input.

_________________
dumpjack: "I haven't liked anything he's done so far, but I'll still listen."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:51 am 
Offline
"Weddings, Parties, Anything…"
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 843
Location: rockdale
dnorwood Wrote:
Scarlett be damned-- I'll be watching Ewan.

Image


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:46 am 
Offline
Worldwide Phenomenon

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 3052
I finally figured out where I have seen that Oompa Loompa guy before - Flash Gordon. He was one of the onlookers in Ming's castle when Flash was playing "football" with the guards.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:25 am 
Offline
Cutler Apologist
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:44 pm
Posts: 7978
Location: a secret lab underneath the volcano
ANGRYNAKEDGUY Wrote:
I'm still pissed that Marilyn Manson isn't playing a wanker.


My thoughts about the movie:

1. Does anybody else here think that Augustus Gloop looked like Billy Corgan? :lol:

2. Yeah, the music was cool, especially the opening/title theme by Danny Elfman.

3. Johnny Depp's voice was incredibly annoying throughout.

4. Overall, pretty entertaining. I thought the ending was alright.

5. I'll be going to see Corpse Bride, I loved The Nightmare Before Christmas.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:35 am 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 1:39 am
Posts: 6365
Location: Australia
Borg166 Wrote:
I'm saving Charlie and the Chocolate Factory for next week, but I just saw Wedding Crashers and it was a blast. Great movie to see with a bunch of friends who enjoy a good R-rated comedy.


i don't get the American ratings system. How is this movie R-rated? Here this would be PG - 13 or maybe M at a stretch.

_________________
dances on all fours...


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:44 am 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 10237
Location: Hill
Isn't M equivalent to R? 17+?


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:47 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:47 am
Posts: 13881
Location: parts unknown
seeing it this weekend.

_________________
http://www.geminicrow.com


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:26 pm 
Offline
Post-Breakup Solo Project
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 10:14 pm
Posts: 3298
i missed the 'there's no earthly way of knowing....' part BIG TIME.

(but like the new one. ....A LOT.)

_________________
http://www.flickr.com/sunshinedaystar


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:45 pm 
Offline
Garage Band
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:17 am
Posts: 589
Following more closely to a book means crap to me. Gene Wilder is Willy Wonka, the curly hair, the boyish grin, the madness sitting behind the eyes. The sets actually seemed cooler and more creative in the original. The addition of back stories detracted from the focus. I don't want to know why Wonka's a madman but i do want him to be a madman and not just a cook with weird hair. It was already a creepy movie, and even more so because of the time it was made... this one just feels forced, uncreative and dated.

BTW, if you really want to see Manson as Wonka check out one of his earlier videos from Portrait of an American Family. It defines freaky.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:15 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:07 pm
Posts: 12618
ANGRYNAKEDGUY Wrote:
I finally figured out where I have seen that Oompa Loompa guy before - Flash Gordon. He was one of the onlookers in Ming's castle when Flash was playing "football" with the guards.


he was also in an x-files episode where he played some kind of hindu mystic who was avenging some chemical plant disaster in India by killing people (he would somehow get inside them and control their bodies) - he rolled around on a little cart.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:15 am 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 1:48 am
Posts: 7332
Location: Cloud 3.14159
a mighty good leader Wrote:
Borg166 Wrote:
I'm saving Charlie and the Chocolate Factory for next week, but I just saw Wedding Crashers and it was a blast. Great movie to see with a bunch of friends who enjoy a good R-rated comedy.
i don't get the American ratings system. How is this movie R-rated? Here this would be PG - 13 or maybe M at a stretch.
I actually heard a review on the radio, wherein the guy applauded them for making a good, let's not pretend we're catering to teenagers and just go full out R-rated comedy.

So I suspect it's language. Perhaps some nudity? I don't know, I haven't seen it. (We are talking about Wedding Crashers here -- Charlie... is rated PG.)

_________________
I remain,
:-Peter, aka :-Dusty :-(halk


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:22 am 
Offline
The Great American Songbook

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: dystopia parkway
coma Wrote:
Following more closely to a book means crap to me.


I was having this discussion with someone the other day. Why not? It was originally a book. It wasn't originally a movie starring Gene Wilder. Following more closely to the book means following more closely to the original message, means being more faithful to original intent, which in my eyes usually means better. The book is far superior to either of these movies, but as a representation of the novel (and imo as a film,) the Buron version is better.

Quote:
Gene Wilder is Willy Wonka, the curly hair, the boyish grin, the madness sitting behind the eyes.


No, I'm afraid Gene Wilder is not Willy Wonka. Willy Wonka is Willy Wonka, and only Roald Dahl knows what or who he really was, and maybe he himself didn't really know. Gene Wilder poisoned your mind into thinking that he was Willy Wonka, but he was really just Gene Wilder. He didn't even do that much acting, he just played the kind of part that I think Gene Wilder kind of plays. "The curly hair?" I'm not sure what it says in the book about Wonka's hair, but curly hair does not a character make. And the boyish grin? Does Depp never grin in his incarnation? Or is it not boyish enough for you? What is the problem exactly?

Quote:
The sets actually seemed cooler and more creative in the original.

I can't see how you think that's possible. The chocolate river in the older film does not look like chocolate. It looks orange. They flew around in an glass elevator in this one and passed by a lot of really cool stuff in this one. And the sets were real. There were no green screens, it was all real.

Quote:
The addition of back stories detracted from the focus. I don't want to know why Wonka's a madman but i do want him to be a madman and not just a cook with weird hair. It was already a creepy movie, and even more so because of the time it was made... this one just feels forced, uncreative and dated.


The addition of the back story was something I thought I'd have a big problem with going into it, but I just found it really funny when Depp floated off into a flashback and forgot where he was and just started thinking about Daddy. I enjoyed that a lot more than Wilder's "curly hair."

_________________
Once she loved a boy. But he did not love her.
His name was Jun. Disillusioned she tried to forget.
She left everything and traveled to the other world.
But life was like a dream.
A series of meaningless movement.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:09 am 
Offline
Forever moderating your hearts
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 6906
Location: Auckland, NZ
HaqDiesel Wrote:
Isn't M equivalent to R? 17+?


M = recommended for 15+ (i think), not enforced


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:45 pm 
Offline
Winona Ryder wears my t-shirt on TV

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:10 pm
Posts: 2532
Location: Cleveland, OH
I eat my words about July 15 being the last great weekend for summer movies this year.

This weekend looks great too (Bad News Bears, The Island).


Back to top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Style by Midnight Phoenix & N.Design Studio
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.