I'm with this

not my finest grammatical moment.

Posting on obner is sometimes like a bad dream that mixes all the hell of English/Composition, Typing, and the Coweta County Spelling Bee....

Doesn't the government know that the Porn industry is a multi-billion dollar industry?

I actually would like to see the porn industry be united and turn all of their resources to fight this. They would totally fight below the belt.........*rimshot*.

But can you just see the Jenna Jameson's of the world testifying before Congress about Obscenity?

[congressman]so, Mr. uh hmmm Butts, what exactly do you mean by 'all anal action'?[/congressman]

BTW, in case you clods missed the Ed Meese reference; the government already did this in the 80's when Meese was AG under Reagan. They compiled all the like filthiest shit they could come up with in this report.....as you can see, it did a lot to slow down the porn industry, because Lord knows its been pretty stagnant since the 80's......

It would be a laugh watching the Senator's struggling to feign incredulity as to the oeuvre of the various witnesses.

I'd pay good money to hear ANY senator read some dialogue.

"So, Ms. Coxxx, do you think that "Take out that big black snake and fuck my hot backdoor gash until my colon bleeds" is prurient, or against community standards?"

Cut to a few staffers manhandling themselves on the Senate floor.

Come to think of it, this has all the makings of an AWESOME porno movie.

Ms. Smith does Washington? Potomac Daddy? Everyone in Chambers?

The District's Deep Dick Delight Vol.117

(Will never have anything on Interacial Gang Bang 9 or Asian Street Hookers 18, but I think it has potential..especially if we get any of Trent Lott's staff to participate)

Vol. 117?

How many cum-shots does that equal, for the series?

I figure we could do 435, one for every member of the house and senate, or just do 100, invoking the Imus rule that house members aren't worthy.

Seymour could at least film the congressional hearings with all his dialogue in the background.

Everybody knows that House members are gang of lame, needle dicked, masturbaters. We need performers. We need the Senate.

Yeah, but you know, Loretta Sanchez...I FUH, and her fat sister.

But then again, you know Kay Bailey Hutchinson takes it in The Seat.

Debbie Stabenow, anyone?

Now that's more discussion appropriate.[/b]

And Diane Feinstein is just FILTHY in the sack.

yeah, and her cock is bigger and thicker than the coke can I pack in my jockeys.

Back to my previous question. I think that you're right, Bloor, in your neither answer. Childhood abuse certainly seems to perpetuate the molo situation. Where's the "original sin", though. You, in a way, are claiming nature and nurture at the same time. I've heard the argument that "hey, this has always gone on, you just didn't know about it back then". I disagree in that it hasn't always gone on at the level that it now does. Why the increase? (Even though it is my own, theoretical, increase).

Hey, plenty of work for she-males and chicks-with-dicks out there as well.

I've oftern wondered if, like shark attacks, this is something that just SEEMS more prevalent now. But damn if every single day there isn't a new dude arrested with a McGruff costume in the back of molester van, and jars and jars of feces samples whence they search his house.

The one thing I support the death penalty for.

I think that is pretty much my perception of nature/nurture----there are no absolutes with either.

And as to the increase, this something I've pondered/debated with Sen.: My answer is, honestly that I dont know. If it is just media hype I honestly dont have a problem with it. Kinda like the Holacaust, I think we should talk about this shit if for nothing else, to wake people out of their ignorance and make them keep a closer eye on they damn kids.

well, you have to figure if more kids are being molested, then there will as a result be more child molestors in the future.

Is there any data to support an increase that it's more prevalent now though aside from a theoretical supposition? As the population increases, there are gonna be more around, just by the Law.

I'm going to go and agree with Bloor on this one, because while it might not be a 50/50 split on genetics/environment aka nature/nurture, these guys are probably born as much as they're shaped by an early exposure to some ped. Can you predict who'll be one and who won't? Not as far as I know you can't. .

I thought it was in the papers just a month or so ago that child abuse cases are actually lower than before, but you just hear about them more frequently a la the shark attack syndrome.

OH MY GOD THERE'S A SHARK IN HERE!!??????