Football in the windy city

e-stone · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:20 pm

robotboy Wrote:

gobbles Wrote:

i know, i know...you guys have barely beaten the shittiest teams in the league. you are supposed to do that, and you have. congrats.
i just want to see what happens when you play an actual quality team.

1-6.

this is the dumbest fucking reasoning. so it's the bears fault that they beat the teams that they are SUPPOSED to beat? how does that count against them?

and for all intensive purposes, they should be 7-2 if it wasn't for that browns debacle. even that redskins game.

meanwhile, miami is 3-6.
[img][354:500]http://www.quickserv.cc/images/crybaby.jpg[/img]

no, actually, it's not dumb reasoning. i just said that you beat the teams you are supposed to.

look, all i'm saying is i'd like to see the bears beat a team with a winning record. you know, a good team. i would think you guys would feel the same way.

i KNOW you don't think the bears are going anywhere this year other than a wild card loss.

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:21 pm

Yailvon Bloorsdale Wrote:

Spade Kitty Wrote:

If the Packers win this game, you will never hear the end of it this week

And it'll hurt pretty bad coming from a third tier boarder like you.

And I think we'll come back and win, but see, I'm a realist--so we might not.

And to the other Chi-Obs: I'd probably actually be pulling for the Bears since they are a great story this year but your boy Spade sours the whole thing by being such a miserable fuck---yelch.

e-stone · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:23 pm

Spade Kitty Wrote:

Coming into this week, the Bears aren't even top five in easiest schedule played thus far in terms of W-L.

do you have this list? i'm curious to see it.

Spade Kitty · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:49 am **Posts:** 4401

If being a miserable fuck is rubbing in your faces when you're wrong about a team you know nothing about and hardly pay any attention to (but act like an authority on)

well then yes, I'm a fuck. And color me miserable.

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:24 pm

gobbles Wrote:

robotboy Wrote:

gobbles Wrote:

i know, i know...you guys have barely beaten the shittiest teams in the league. you are supposed to do that, and you have. congrats.
i just want to see what happens when you play an actual quality team.

1-6.

this is the dumbest fucking reasoning. so it's the bears fault that they beat the teams that they are SUPPOSED to beat? how does that count against them?

and for all intensive purposes, they should be 7-2 if it wasn't for that browns debacle. even that redskins game.

meanwhile, miami is 3-6.
[img][354:500]http://www.quickserv.cc/images/crybaby.jpg[/img]

no, actually, it's not dumb reasoning. i just said that you beat the teams you are supposed to.

look, all i'm saying is i'd like to see the bears beat a team with a winning record. you know, a good team. i would think you guys would feel the same way.

i KNOW you don't think the bears are going anywhere this year other than a wild card loss.

are they going to win the super bowl? nah, probably not. but would I have ever thought that they'd be going to the playoffs this year? I thought it, but it was hard to really believe. they get to the playoffs, and everything else is gravy.

6-3 BITCHES

Spade Kitty · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:49 am **Posts:** 4401

Look, they are going to win the division. They are not even going to have a losing record in doing so. They could lose 85-0 to the Falcons in the playoffs and I'll wear a smile on my face because they still will have exceeded expectations after Grossman went down.

e-stone · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:26 pm

robotboy Wrote:

6-3 BITCHES

7-9 by the end of the season. 8-8 at best.

Spade Kitty · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:49 am **Posts:** 4401

gobbles Wrote:

Spade Kitty Wrote:

Coming into this week, the Bears aren't even top five in easiest schedule played thus far in terms of W-L.

do you have this list? i'm curious to see it.

Dan Patrick ran the list down this week on his radio show. I believe the Colts are number 1 and the Bengals are way up there. When you play teams like the Texans twice, it's pretty easy to make this list.

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:28 pm

gobbles Wrote:

robotboy Wrote:

6-3 BITCHES

7-9 by the end of the season. 8-8 at best.

you honestly think they will win ONE game from here on out? seriously?

e-stone · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:30 pm

robotboy Wrote:

gobbles Wrote:

robotboy Wrote:

6-3 BITCHES

7-9 by the end of the season. 8-8 at best.

you honestly think they will win ONE game from here on out? seriously?

until they prove me wrong by beating a good team, then yeah.

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:31 pm

remaining bears games

panthers
bucs
packers
steelers
falcons
packers
vikings

really? only one of those?

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:32 pm

interesting. because 3 of the remaining games are against "sub par" teams.

e-stone · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:33 pm

they'll beat the packers at home.

Yail Bloor · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:34 pm

Spade Kitty Wrote:

If being a miserable fuck is rubbing in your faces when you're wrong about a team you know nothing about and hardly pay any attention to (but act like an authority on)

this from the guy who a year ago was trying to convince me that Anthony Thomas was an elite running back.

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:34 pm

man i wish i had you in my office pick em pool

Spade Kitty · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:49 am **Posts:** 4401

Yailvon Bloorsdale Wrote:

Spade Kitty Wrote:

If being a miserable fuck is rubbing in your faces when you're wrong about a team you know nothing about and hardly pay any attention to (but act like an authority on)

this from the guy who a year ago was trying to convince me that Anthony Thomas was an elite running back.

I'll admit I was wrong about some things. One of them was not the 2005 Bears.

e-stone · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:39 pm

in all seriousness, how do you see them finishing out the year?
you can't be totally comfortable with the way orton is playing at QB vs. the panthers, falcons, bucs, steelers.
against these teams, orton WILL have to throw the ball. even vs. the vikings, who are suddenly able to put up points.

Spade Kitty · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:49 am **Posts:** 4401

robotboy Wrote:

remaining bears games

panthers
bucs
packers
steelers
falcons
packers
vikings

really? only one of those?

3-5 says me and my friend Andrew Jackson.

Spade Kitty · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:49 am **Posts:** 4401

gobbles Wrote:

in all seriousness, how do you see them finishing out the year?
you can't be totally comfortable with the way orton is playing at QB vs. the panthers, falcons, bucs, steelers.
against these teams, orton WILL have to throw the ball. even vs. the vikings, who are suddenly able to put up points.

The same Buccaneers that lost to San Francisco?

Spade Kitty · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:49 am **Posts:** 4401

Ha there's only 7 games left. I mean 3-4

e-stone · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:44 pm

Spade Kitty Wrote:

gobbles Wrote:

in all seriousness, how do you see them finishing out the year?
you can't be totally comfortable with the way orton is playing at QB vs. the panthers, falcons, bucs, steelers.
against these teams, orton WILL have to throw the ball. even vs. the vikings, who are suddenly able to put up points.

The same Buccaneers that lost to San Francisco?

yes, the same bucs that lost to the same san francisco 49er's that should have beat your bears if you take away a freak (yet awesome) play.

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:45 pm

gobbles Wrote:

in all seriousness, how do you see them finishing out the year?
you can't be totally comfortable with the way orton is playing at QB vs. the panthers, falcons, bucs, steelers.
against these teams, orton WILL have to throw the ball. even vs. the vikings, who are suddenly able to put up points.

i will not be surprised if they lose at least 2 of those 4 games. that's why good teams beat the teams that they are supposed to. but i am not expecting them to lose. the defense is the best in the league. as long as the offense is efficient and doesn't do anything stupid, they'll be fine. the vikings only put up points off of an int, kick return and punt return today. the int may happen vs. the bears, but not the special teams.

Yail Bloor · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:45 pm

Spade Kitty Wrote:

Yailvon Bloorsdale Wrote:

Spade Kitty Wrote:

If being a miserable fuck is rubbing in your faces when you're wrong about a team you know nothing about and hardly pay any attention to (but act like an authority on)

this from the guy who a year ago was trying to convince me that Anthony Thomas was an elite running back.

I'll admit I was wrong about some things. One of them was not the 2005 Bears.

I guess that makes me 1-1... :cry:

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:46 pm

Spade Kitty Wrote:

gobbles Wrote:

in all seriousness, how do you see them finishing out the year?
you can't be totally comfortable with the way orton is playing at QB vs. the panthers, falcons, bucs, steelers.
against these teams, orton WILL have to throw the ball. even vs. the vikings, who are suddenly able to put up points.

The same Buccaneers that lost to San Francisco?

oh snap

robotboy · **Posted:** Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:46 pm

gobbles Wrote:

Spade Kitty Wrote:

gobbles Wrote:

in all seriousness, how do you see them finishing out the year?
you can't be totally comfortable with the way orton is playing at QB vs. the panthers, falcons, bucs, steelers.
against these teams, orton WILL have to throw the ball. even vs. the vikings, who are suddenly able to put up points.

The same Buccaneers that lost to San Francisco?

yes, the same bucs that lost to the same san francisco 49er's that should have beat your bears if you take away a freak (yet awesome) play.

if you take away that play, the bears still win 10-9.

Football in the windy city

Who is online