Gar Stocking Stuffinnvold Wrote:
All I meant, kiddo, was that any time a woman (or man, for that matter, and more importantly, and not to put too fine a point on it) feels the need to stridently defend promiscuity, then the defender is oneself a cheap slag.
Not that I am against copious amounts of intercourse (and other sexual contact (qualification appended since I know many, even some here, and even the atheists among us, use the biblic canard that sex is only phallo-to-vaginal contact, so everything else is fair game and should not be questioned) and, pointedly, outside of a marital bond - in fact, sex outside of marriage needs to be encouraged, so no one makes a fool of oneself on the honeymoon, or thereafter, as making oneself the fool would imperil the health of not just the bedroom manner, but the marriage as a whole - but when there is an insistence to bedhop, and an insistence that it is a right, you are playing with fire.
... And on that note, given the profligacy of our board's membership in the sack, I have a hundred shares of Valtrex stock to buy now, so I'm gone.
not that i really give a shit anymore, but... my intention was not to stridently defend promiscuity, but rather to express my disgust in the antiquated and arbitrary double standard that the original statement imposed.
but hey, thanks for implying i'm a slut, asshole.
and, i can say with absolute certainty that i have never given, and will never give your mimbo roommate head. guys named jamie just don't deserve it.
