Elvis Fu Wrote:
Spade Kitty Wrote:
Alright, let's see some links to said studies.
Vitamin Pills Do Not Stop Cancer. BBC News brief from UK Medical Journal
The Lancet report from Cancer Research UK.
Let's see, vitamins don't stop cancer? Not much does. No surprise. May shorten life expectancy? Based on what, the fact that some people "died sooner than expected?" Literally tons of factors involved in sustaining life and to conclude that Vitamins may have shortened life expectancy any more than any of the other 1 miilion factors is ludicrous. The steak aunt bessie ate last night might have given her a heart attack too.
Quote:
Vitamins Bad For Cholesterol?. Health Central commentary on research by New York University School of Medicine, published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Let's say I take this study at face value and actually believe the findings ARE true (not just may be true) All cholestoral-lowering drugs are liver-suppressants, and vitamins help the liver to function at a higher level, ie producing more cholestoral. That's not entirely surprising. How much are the LDLs raised by? Hard for me to put stock in any study that actually does give quantitative data when it cites potentially unhealthy increases. An unhealthy liver or slightly higher cholestoral? I think I'll take my chances with the healthy liver, thank you. Also, medical studies still do not know NEARLY enough about cholestoral or its effects to offer a whole lot that is totally conclusive about heart disease.
Even so, quotes from the article :
"However, our study is the first to document this association between antioxidant vitamins and VLDL cholesterol, and more studies are needed to back up our findings," says Dr. Fisher, who is also Director of the Marc and Ruti Bell Vascular Biology and Disease Research Program at NYU.
"Until more data becomes available, we can't make any recommendations about whether people should not use these vitamins," says Dr. Fisher.Sounds like this study doesn't really have a lot to offer if the people involved aren't even sure the findings are relevant.
Quote:
Vitamins Flunk Again. Health Central commentary on research done by an assload of people, including Harvard School of Public Health.
EXCERPT:
doctors with higher blood levels of antioxidant vitamins, specifically carotenes and vitamin E, were not protected from a heart attack. As a matter of fact, higher levels of gamma tocopherol, a type of vitamin E, were associated with higher rates of heart attacks. What do you have to say about this: Conclusions- These prospective data do not support an overall protective relation between plasma carotenoids or tocopherols and future MI risk among men without a history of prior cardiovascular disease.
Quote:
Vitamins, Less Is More. Health Central commentary about by French researchers. "A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Health Effects of Antioxidant Vitamins and Minerals".
Conclusions After 7.5 years, low-dose antioxidant supplementation
lowered total cancer incidence and all-cause mortality in men but not in women. Supplementation may be effective in men only because of their lower baseline status of certain antioxidants, especially of beta carotene.
In other words, if you're a guy and you take a low-dose antioxidant supplementation (vs. no supplementation at all), it benefits you. No one is saying overdo it, but you seem to be advocating not taking vitamins or antioxidants at all, and yet the conclusion here seems to assert that it's beneficial.