Postmersh Wrote:
Diggity Dawg Wrote:
I was talking more along the lines of ABC's comedy offerings - now, and even historically. I can't think of one show "AD" is remotely similar to or compatible with.
...hence Fox's struggles with pairing it with a compatible show. I mean, believe it or not FOX, despite a wide spectrum of failed dramas/sitcoms, is actually pretty full programmingwise, especially when you consider the Fall-to-Winter rollover (24 and American Idol debut then) and Baseball Playoffs in the fall pre-empting a lot of programming in October.
I still think AD could be a summertime ratings boon for the network but, at 1.4-1.6 mil/episode, is it really worth it? I mean, if another network picks up AD, Fox still will make the bulk of the revenue that the show produces (20th TV will still own DVD/Syn. rights) while that other network will pick up a great deal of the production costs.
My (uneducated) guess? Even if they keep doing 13 episode seasons, it'll make it to the 88 required for syndication, and then some. Remember, there were not 1, but 2 seasons of "The Drew Carey Show" that got produced, then dumped/shoved on Wednesday nights during the summer and pulled minimal ads/ratings. Why? Because, at the end of it's run, the Drew Carey show was pulling so much money on just the syndication rights per episode that ABC made money just by producing the show - and this was pre-TV on DVD.
Don't disagree with a thing you said.
The one difference is that Drew Carey's show was a show that at least at one point had a sizeable audience - making it a MUCH easier sell.
Having said that, the general feeling is that "AD" is a show that would play really, really well in syndication - due to the density of the humor. It'd hold up really well to repeated viewings, like "The Simpsons" - you know, the whole "everytime I watch it I see jokes I missed the last time" concept.
The whole trick would be in getting people to watch in the 1st place, though.