Stephen Stills. Plays a mean guitar, has a cool voice. Teamed up with Neil Young, Bruce Palmer, Richie Furay and Dewey Martin to form the Buffalo Springfield, and he penned "For What It's Worth", which became a protest anthem then, and probably pays quite of few of his bills now.
According to several accounts I've read, Stills & Young had a creative bond that propelled the Springfield, but the inevitable personality clashes between two strong minded individuals had a tendency to cause friction within bands. Stills is a huge egomaniac, who demands attention. Young is a quiet egomaniac who commands attention. Young was one of only a few people able to leave Stills speechless, because he was able to walk away.
But…
What if Stills had realized what potential a Stills/Young partnership could have held for the two artists, rather than going and playing grabass with those two pussies Crosby & Nash?
Neil Young released his first solo album in 1969, then followed it up with a hell of a six album run from
Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere in 1969 to
Zuma in 1975. He also dabbled in the CSNY Musical Amusement Park. Unsurprisingly, he never really was a full member of the band, for he had a tendency to come and go as he pleased, depending on his mood.
Stills went from legitimate rocker to harmonizing on crap like "Our House". He was the balls in CSN, which is a lot like being the ace of the Orioles' starting five. In addition to CSN, he also released
Stephen Stills and [/i]Stephen Stills 2[/i], but he really topped out with
Manassas in 1972. Manassas had balls. Manassas rocked. For one album. I've actually never heard the second release, but I've also never read anything positive about it.
But what if Stephen Stills had been able to see the possible creative output of an extended partnership with Neil Young? They got back together for 1976's
Long May You Run, but that was more like being drunk one night and bumping into your chick you banged for a while in freshman year. It ain't the same. You've both changed. The magic they had between them while laying down the "88,000" guitar parts in "Bluebird" was gone, unlikely to be uncovered again.
Could the competitive and rival egos of Stephen Stills and Neil Young driven a creative partnership to be dropped on Mount Olympus with Gods like Lennon/McCartney and Jagger/Richards? Hell, what about a short run like Farrar/Tweedy?
Neil Young has made a hell of a name for himself, choirs or no choirs. I liked Neil Young's 2005 release
Prairie Wind. It's not his greatest, but it's enjoyable. But Stephen Stills? His 2005 release,
Man Alive!, was one of the worst records I've ever heard. It was even worse than that Big Star record from last year.
Plus, he turned into this guy, some sort of cross John Goodman impersonator who follows Jimmy Buffett when he's not playing a State Fair.
[img][408:500]http://img.nesteklikk.no/2005-24/large/60677.jpg[/img]