Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Bright Eyes review in the Sunday NY Times
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:38 pm 
Offline
Worldwide Phenomenon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:49 pm
Posts: 3003
Location: ilXor.com
January 16, 2005

By KELEFA SANNEH

HOW did indie rock become the voice of emotional sincerity? Ten years ago, in the heyday of Pavement and Liz Phair and Beck (the old, funny Beck), indie rockers were supposed to be at least a little bit prickly. The genre was known for its urbane disinclination to perform any icky operations involving hearts: pouring them out, for instance, or affixing them to sleeves.

But by 2004, indie rock sounded sweeter and more earnest than ever. It was the year a long-running (and somewhat cranky) band called Modest Mouse sold half a million copies of "Good News for People Who Love Bad News," featuring the unexpectedly joyful single "Float On." The wistful, whistlable songs of the Shins took pride of place on the hit soundtrack to the movie "Garden State." The gently melancholic singer Ben Gibbard became something like a mainstream star, with the continuing crossover success of his band, Death Cab for Cutie (recently signed to Atlantic Records), and his electro-pop side project, the Postal Service. The television show "The O.C." made a point of stuffing its soundtrack with achy alt-rock love songs. And you could even hear this sensibility reflected in the wide-eyed wonder of folk-inspired weirdos like Devendra Banhart, Animal Collective and Joanna Newsom, all of whom were praised (however inaccurately) for their perceived purity and innocence.

If you're looking for a symbol of the new sincerity, it's hard to do better than Conor Oberst, the 24-year-old singer-songwriter who has spent the last decade recording audacious hyper-romantic songs under the name Bright Eyes. One early song, "Padraic My Prince," used the (fictional) drowning death of his baby brother as an analogy for getting dumped. By 2002, he had already amassed a cult of rabid Conorians, who hung on his every lament, but he wanted more. So he recorded "Lifted, or the Story Is in the Soil, Keep Your Ear to the Ground" (Saddle Creek), a tangled treatise on love and faith and truth, full of ragged orchestra crescendos and yawping finales.

The album turned an underground heartthrob from Omaha into one of indie rock's biggest stars, and in the two and a half years since its release, every month has brought more exposure to the singer whom fans had once kept like a secret. There were sold-out tours, gushing magazine profiles and surreal TV appearances, including an odd visit to David Letterman. The low point came when People magazine printed a widely circulated picture of Mr. Oberst kissing Winona Ryder; the high point came last fall, when he played a series of "Vote for Change" concerts with his former idols and new friends R.E.M. and Bruce Springsteen - the Nebraska kid and the "Nebraska" guy, together at last.

Along the way, he became a character - and, to his detractors, a caricature. That precious name, those tortured ballads: even compared to your average sad-sack indie-rock band, Bright Eyes sounded pretty extreme. (The busters, like the boosters, vented online; one short-lived site was called, simply, We Hate Bright Eyes!) Bright Eyes fans didn't help their cause by celebrating their idol's broken-down voice as proof of his wounded soul, and by lionizing the music as a heartfelt antidote to our heartless pop culture. Yuck. If some potential listeners decided, in advance, that this stylized anxiety was the last thing they needed, can you blame them?

Mr. Oberst was well aware of these pitfalls, and he struggled with them energetically. He knows that his fragile voice inspires unearned credulity in his fans. (In a song called "False Advertising," he criticized his own "well-rehearsed" sorrow.) And he knows nonfans might be skeptical of some Dylan-obsessed kid singing ontological love songs while abusing an acoustic guitar. He understands, because he's skeptical, too. Which, depending on your perspective, makes him either one of the most sincere indie rockers around or one of the least.

On the Tuesday after next, Saddle Creek will release, separately, two new Bright Eyes albums, taking this story in two different directions. "Digital Ash in a Digital Urn" is a bold response to the myth of St. Conor: the icon of unplugged authenticity goes not just electric but electronic, letting the mythology melt away in a solvent of flickering rhythms and chirping synthesizers. Then there's "I'm Wide Awake, It's Morning," which is even bolder. "Wide Awake" captures the spare, shivery sound of Mr. Oberst daring to embrace the role of Serious Singer-Songwriter, instead of shadowboxing with it: the folky arrangements give him plenty of room to tell his stories, and the only thing chirping is Emmylou Harris, singing backup.

"Digital Ash" is the album more likely to convert nonfans (and, for that matter, music supervisors for Hollywood movies - a handful of songs sound distinctly soundtrackable). Somehow, the music is both louder and softer than anything Mr. Oberst has done before: instead of grabbing you by the throat, the songs float gently toward you. The desperation in Mr. Oberst's voice remains, but now it's cushioned by fuzzy guitars and keyboards, and the old tantrums and rallying cries have been replaced by resigned shrugs and halfhearted optimism. The album's first single, released late last year, was "Take It Easy (Love Nothing)," a bubbling collaboration with Jimmy Tamborello, the beatmaker behind the Postal Service. As an electric guitar twists around him, Mr. Oberst sums up lost love not as tragedy, but as bittersweet relief: "Now I do as I please and I lie through my teeth/ Someone might get hurt but it won't be me/ I should probably feel cheap but I just feel free/ And a little bit empty."

The old idealism remains, but it's been muted, and Mr. Oberst's voice is often half-buried and occasionally disfigured, as if to keep the true believers from getting too close. If Mr. Oberst had recorded the song "I Believe in Symmetry" a few years ago, it probably would have sounded grandiose and a little bit cockeyed. (One stanza begins, "An argument for consciousness/ The instinct of the blind insect.") But now he's sly enough to do something that makes those words go down a lot easier: he sings them to a tune that echoes Nena's 1984 hit "99 Luftballons." And in "Arc of Time (Time Code)," he gets a galloping computer-generated beat and some computer-processed guitar; when he sings about blacking out "in the covered cage of night," he makes oblivion seem seductive. That's the appeal of this album, which conjures up the warmish feeling you get when everything gets fuzzy and you finally fall asleep.

Then you wake up. After all that haze, "I'm Wide Awake It's Morning" comes as a shock: 10 stark, sharply written songs, all of which contain at least a passing reference to that startling but banal moment described in the title. Whereas "Digital Ash" finds graceful ways to de-emphasize the link between singer and song, "Wide Awake" embraces it. You can't listen to this album the way you might listen to "Digital Ash" (or, for that matter, most other indie-rock albums), letting the words float away and humming the tune. You have to pay attention: for 45 minutes, the singer becomes a narrator becomes a character, singing stories about a life that's a version of his own.

This is the kind of role-playing that got Mr. Oberst so gloriously twisted up in knots two years ago. "Lifted" was an hourlong struggle with the notion of musical sincerity; the singer (or was it just the narrator?) wondered aloud whether the process of writing a song was merely the process of getting into character, feigning the feeling he was hoping to conjure up. "This method acting, well, I call that living," he bawled, complaining but not quite apologizing. And if he screamed a lot on that album, perhaps it was because he wanted to unite the guy in the song with the guy singing the song: in a climactic wordless shriek, the two performances merged; the story became the sound, and vice versa.

The same tensions reappear on "Wide Awake," but there's no more fighting, and not much screaming; he has stopped struggling and started to play along. Mr. Oberst knows that truth is a musical illusion - it's what listeners think they're hearing when someone finds exactly the right mixture of clichés and lies. But it's an addictive illusion, and when he gets the recipe right, the results are both astonishing and slightly disorienting. His narratives aim to suck you in, the way you might get sucked into a book or a movie. (Oddly enough, newcomers might feel this effect more intensely than longtime listeners, who probably know these songs by heart: all 10 are Bright Eyes concert favorites, and live MP3's have been freely circulating for years.)

These songs are high-wire acts: listeners don't have much to focus on besides his voice and his words, so one errant phrase can send the whole contraption hurtling back toward earth. (One song comes to a grinding halt with some hokey symbolism, as Mr. Oberst and Ms. Harris harmonize, "Did you forget your yellow bird?/How could you forget your yellow bird?") And sometimes the focus on lyrics is exhausting. A love-and-war ballad called "Land Locked Blues" slows down the album's second half, not least because Mr. Oberst already released a bigger, better version on a compilation last year, under the title "One Foot in Front of the Other."

Most of the time, though, "Wide Awake" is enthralling. "Old Soul Song (for the New World Order)" is the best kind of protest song: a cryptic one. The first verse lovingly evokes the New York City antiwar march of Feb. 15, 2003, without naming it: "The crowd kept pushing forward, till they swallowed the police/ Yeah, they went wild." The second verse finds the narrator in a darkroom with a friend, reliving the day: "You drop the paper in the water and it all begins to bloom/ Yeah, they go wild." There's a subtext here, although only the most obsessed fan could be expected to know it. The day of the rally was also the day Mr. Oberst turned 23; so the protest song may also be his secret way of wishing himself happy birthday.

Then there's "Train Under Water," which might be the most complete song he's ever written. It's a breakup song of startling clarity, free of spite or regret, and maybe crueler because of it. "It happened to me, now it's happening to you," the narrator shrugs, adding, "But if you take that train under water then we could talk it through." A pedal steel guitar and a harmonica add a dash of sympathy, and there are no metanarrative twists or musical surprises or full-throated freakouts, just a single thought, a single story, slowly expanding. He stays in character all the way through - two characters, in fact: an ex-boyfriend learning how to act the part, and a young singer-songwriter doing the same.

The happiest surprise on these two albums is the absence of hand-wringing about the price of fame. Once upon a time, cult heroes who earned even a dash of mainstream success were expected to release a tortured (or, alternately, snarky) album about how awful (or, alternately, hilarious) it all was. But on these two discs, Mr. Oberst doesn't bother to grouse about the mainstream, not even People magazine.

Then again, it's hard for the underground to complain about the overground when no one is quite sure who's who. The dreary old debate about selling out seems less relevant than ever, at a time when bands are routinely praised for licensing their music to TV shows and even commercials. And an indie-rock culture that once worshipped the limited-edition record has reconciled itself to the age of unlimited-edition MP3's circulating endlessly on fan Web sites.

Maybe what seems like indie's newfound sincerity is merely the sound of indie acts learning to navigate this strange terrain, to stop worrying and learn to love their ambiguous relationship with the mainstream. The most perceptive indie-rock stars know better than to claim they hate all those chart-topping pop songs, especially if they're trying - sincerely - to write one. For lots of these acts, sincerity is inseparable from ambition: if they believe what they sing, maybe lots of listeners will, too.

You can hear a hint of this ambition in "Another Travelin' Song," a tidy bit of country music from "Wide Awake," when an unsettling dream comes to a sudden end: "I awoke to my alarm clock/ It was a pop song, it was playing loud." Years ago, Mr. Oberst might have delivered these words with a sneer, but now he sounds exhilarated by the imaginary blare, and maybe slightly envious. Why settle for merely infiltrating people's dreams, when you might be able to infiltrate their clock radios, too?

Copyright - New York Times

_________________
Image


Last edited by Bee OK on Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:45 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:35 am
Posts: 14323
Location: cincy
there was a huge article about them by Greg Kot in the Chicago Tribune too.

Edit: actually it was about Conner Oberst ;)


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:05 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:13 am
Posts: 8264
Location: Norfolk, VA
I just don't get it.

Even if the guy can write decent lyrics. Isn't there another format for him besides music? bleh. I watched him on that ACL I believe. My two friends and I just sat there wondering what the fuck was happening. It sounded awful. He and M. Ward played a tune as well and I'll be damned if out of the 12 strings between the two of them not a single one was in tune with the other.

It's just bad music. Mixed with bad vocals.

I don't even care how possibly self-deprecating Mr. Oberst can be. It's not the point. Publish your lyrics or something. Just because you write lyrics that can get recognition doesn't necesitate that you be the one to perform them.

And "the new sincerity" is rather confusing to me. What exactly is he talking about. He follows up that point with a whole lot of nothing. And maybe it's just me but the author here seems to criticize people like Beck and Pavement. It seemed subtle, but it definitely seemed biting. As though Conor Oberst is an icon that we should all look up to. The author needs to wipe his chin and his nose. Conor's not gonna hook you up with Winona buddy. It ain't happenin'.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:10 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
Hegel-oh's Wrote:
I just don't get it.

Even if the guy can write decent lyrics. Isn't there another format for him besides music? bleh. I watched him on that ACL I believe. My two friends and I just sat there wondering what the fuck was happening. It sounded awful. He and M. Ward played a tune as well and I'll be damned if out of the 12 strings between the two of them not a single one was in tune with the other.

It's just bad music. Mixed with bad vocals.

I don't even care how possibly self-deprecating Mr. Oberst can be. It's not the point. Publish your lyrics or something. Just because you write lyrics that can get recognition doesn't necesitate that you be the one to perform them.

And "the new sincerity" is rather confusing to me. What exactly is he talking about. He follows up that point with a whole lot of nothing. And maybe it's just me but the author here seems to criticize people like Beck and Pavement. It seemed subtle, but it definitely seemed biting. As though Conor Oberst is an icon that we should all look up to. The author needs to wipe his chin and his nose. Conor's not gonna hook you up with Winona buddy. It ain't happenin'.


Wow. Open player hatin'.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:12 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:07 pm
Posts: 12618
i like both Bright Eyes and M. Ward - but I also saw that ACL performance and when they tried to jam together, along with Jim James, the result was pretty awful. That MMJ song sounded great though - even with Conor sitting on the stage acting like a doofus.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:24 am 
Offline
Worldwide Phenomenon

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 3052
Bright Eyes is also the featured review in the current issue of Rolling Stone. :?


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:27 am 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 1:39 am
Posts: 6365
Location: Australia
good music with bad lyrics is better than bad music with good lyrics......however this does not apply here because bright eyes make bad music with bad lyrics

_________________
dances on all fours...


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:29 am 
Offline
Troubador
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:23 pm
Posts: 3742
am i the only one who gave devandra banhart and iron & wine a chance and didnt like them? and what ive heard from bright eyes i didnt like either. and i really liked sufjan stevens, so i dont think i just dislike the whole genre. unless theyre not the same, in which case, let me know.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:24 am 
Offline
Major Label Sell Out

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:37 pm
Posts: 1848
Location: DFW.
Northern Soul Wrote:
am i the only one who gave devandra banhart and iron & wine a chance and didnt like them?


gave'em both a chance...I like Iron and Wine, but Devandra just isn't my thing


Back to top
 Profile YIM 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:48 am 
Offline
Forever moderating your hearts
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 6906
Location: Auckland, NZ
jagged Wrote:
Northern Soul Wrote:
am i the only one who gave devandra banhart and iron & wine a chance and didnt like them?


gave'em both a chance...I like Iron and Wine, but Devandra just isn't my thing


ditto

i think Oberst is rather shite too - music for emotional teenage girls.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bright Eyes review in the Sunday NY Times
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 4:05 am 
Offline
Forever moderating your hearts
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:40 pm
Posts: 6906
Location: Auckland, NZ
BeeOK Wrote:
January 16, 2005

HOW did indie rock become the voice of emotional sincerity? Ten years ago, in the heyday of Pavement and Liz Phair and Beck (the old, funny Beck), indie rockers were supposed to be at least a little bit prickly. The genre was known for its urbane disinclination to perform any icky operations involving hearts: pouring them out, for instance, or affixing them to sleeves.


Just because Pavement et al aren't blatently direct, doesn't mean they aren't emotionally sincere - it's about something called subtlety


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:03 am 
Offline
Big in Australia
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:00 am
Posts: 19821
Location: Chicago-ish
I've only heard one song of his ("One Foot In Front of the Other"), and thought it was pretty breathtaking. Curious to hear more, but afraid to spend my head-earned (and already earmarked) money, due to his rep for being so inconsistent.

For a guy like me, what do I get? Or do I wait for a "Best Of..."?

_________________
Paul Caporino of M.O.T.O. Wrote:
I've recently noticed that all the unfortunate events in the lives of blues singers all seem to rhyme... I think all these tragedies could be avoided with a good rhyming dictionary.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:30 am 
Offline
Self-Released 7-Inch
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:43 am
Posts: 1208
Location: Brookfield, WI
rparis74 Wrote:
i like both Bright Eyes and M. Ward - but I also saw that ACL performance and when they tried to jam together, along with Jim James, the result was pretty awful. That MMJ song sounded great though - even with Conor sitting on the stage acting like a doofus.



That sums up my opinion of the performance as well.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:57 pm 
Offline
Worldwide Phenomenon

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:41 pm
Posts: 3158
Location: San Francisco, CA
I think that Lifted . . . is an excellent album. Todd, I highly recommend that you get that and see what you think. I could host it on clevercactus later, if anyone wants me to.

_________________
Radcliffe Wrote:
I'm kinda like Jesus in that respect. And Allah. Jesus and Allah all rolled up into a single ball of seething bitter rage.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:38 pm 
Offline
Hair Trigger of Doom

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:05 pm
Posts: 21295
Location: Subpoenaed in Texas
I watched this over the weekend, and while my opinion of C.O. hasn't improved based on that performance, I still loves me some Jim James and M. Ward. For me, the true revelation of that episode was Wilco. The AGIB songs sound SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much better live, it's not even funny. Great set by Tweedy and Co.!

_________________
bendandscoop.com


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:34 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
Bright Eyes a.ka. Oberst is hit and miss live, it really depends on how much he has had to drink and if he is coked up (at least that is a frequent rumor). I saw him this weekend in Omaha, the third time I have seen him, and this was the only time he didn't seem drugged up and it was wonderful. I missed his theatre show with M Ward and Jim James, but heard it was outstanding. I personally love M Ward, and have never seen him suck live.
Album wise, I have never really loved a Bright Eyes album.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:25 pm 
Offline
The Great American Songbook
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:45 pm
Posts: 4690
Location: Lost Angeles
fightingliberal Wrote:
I personally love M Ward, and have never seen him live.
Album wise, I have never really loved a Bright Eyes album, but I don't find them as intrusive as many others on this board do. I think there are some really good songs in there, although "Lifted.." and the new ones are foriegn to me (as of right now).

_________________
"the pictures of your kitty just made my heart burst into little rainbows of bubblegum and bunnies" - Katie, a princess

Image


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:27 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 10237
Location: Hill
M. Ward is excellent live. Solo, at least. A mofo of a guitarist.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:39 pm 
Offline
Hipster Backlash
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:19 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Nashville
until he does something to personally afront me, i find that i will always be pulling for mr. oberst. i don't even like his music much, but his attitude and (apparent) dedication to friends, fellow musicians, and scene remind me a lot of what i always hoped bands (not already on dischord) would be like.

and i still think his Home ep collaboration with Britt Daniels has so much potential for a full collab (even though "distance" is probably better than anything conor will ever write).

KPH


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:39 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:11 pm
Posts: 6697
Location: no sleep til brooklyn
PopTodd Wrote:
I've only heard one song of his ("One Foot In Front of the Other"), and thought it was pretty breathtaking. Curious to hear more, but afraid to spend my head-earned (and already earmarked) money, due to his rep for being so inconsistent.

For a guy like me, what do I get? Or do I wait for a "Best Of..."?


Either Lifted... or Fevers & Mirrors.

Looks like I'm the only Bright Eyes fan around here, whatever!

As for Devandra Banhart, I didn't get all the hype- not my thing... but I dig Iron & Wine.

_________________
last.fm


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:47 pm 
Offline
KILLFILED

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:14 pm
Posts: 15027
Location: There n' here.
pumachik Wrote:

Looks like I'm the only Bright Eyes fan around here, whatever!



You just want to fuck him... He's your back-up, in case you are to never be able to seduce Thom Yorke.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 5:51 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:11 pm
Posts: 6697
Location: no sleep til brooklyn
Benvolio Wrote:
pumachik Wrote:

Looks like I'm the only Bright Eyes fan around here, whatever!



You just want to fuck him... He's your back-up, in case you are to never be able to seduce Thom Yorke.


DAMN! How'd you know?!

_________________
last.fm


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:07 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:35 am
Posts: 14323
Location: cincy
does anybody else like him?


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 7:39 pm 
Offline
Street Teamer

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 1:37 pm
Posts: 36
Location: Brooklyn
I do. Quite a bit, actually. I never get on people who complain about his admittedly precious vocals, because I can understand it being a turn-off. It happens to not both me much, though. And I think there's something kind of endearing about his lack of an internal filter -- the kind that keeps songwriters from stating the obvious or relying on cliches.

Here's what I'm trying to say...this is the beginning of a review I wrote for the magazine I work for:

There is a widely accepted notion that, at both its best and worst, rock and roll is essentially just a pose, a choreographed act that is carefully and completely crafted in the privacy of some teenager’s bedroom. From the sexually charged gyrations of Robert Plant to the calm, collected swagger of Kanye West, it’d be naïve to assume these personas were brought to fruition without a wealth of time spent in front of a mirror. You don’t just wake up one morning moving your hips like that, and you’re not born with the knowledge that you can pull off wearing a polo shirt underneath a Mickey Mouse sweatshirt. That shit takes practice.

If you spend some time with I’m Wide Awake, It’s Morning and Digital Ash in a Digital Urn, the two new releases by the hugely popular Bright Eyes, you’ll probably get the feeling that Conor Oberst is no different, that he’s spent years obsessing over how he wants to be perceived by the public, and I think you’d be right. You might notice something else as well: Oberst is quite possibly the worst actor ever to strap on a guitar and stand in front of a microphone. And he knows it. And that’s why, in twenty years, people will still be talking about him — because he didn’t have the good sense to know that you can’t possibly say half the shit he says and maintain any semblance of the detached kind of cool that makes rock stars rock stars.

If anyone cares, I'll post the rest of the review tomorrow when I'm at my desk.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:47 am 
Offline
Worldwide Phenomenon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:49 pm
Posts: 3003
Location: ilXor.com
timmyjoe42 Wrote:
does anybody else like him?


Yeah I do, as well, and I’m not an 18-year-old girl. I think Lifted is brilliant and have yet to hear anybody else, so young write like that. Very country or folk in parts and the album is like a novel with “Bowl Of Oranges” being one affectionate single. I am actually a bit scared to hear the new stuff. This is part of what I wrote when it was my number two album of last year:

“And I want to scream out that is all is nonsense…suddenly, it is clear to see that it is not them but me, who has lost my self-identity.” I can’t figure out why Conor Oberst is bashed so much in the indie rock community. Is it because he has already dated Winona Ryder, he sings off key and his voice cracks when it tries to hit some notes, jealousy because this kid was only 22 when he put out such an amazingly good album, or is it because Spin Magazine has called him the Bob Dylan of this generation? I could care less because this is by far my most played album of 2003.

I also read that he has come out of the closet but can’t confirm that yet, so I just take it as rumor.

Yes, Mike BL I would like to see that.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Style by Midnight Phoenix & N.Design Studio
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.