Update: They called back.
"They" was their HR, not the guy himself, which was Strike 1. They offered $18 an hour, which is still below my cutoff of "low 20's" before I'd even consider it, so Strike 2.
She asked at one point, "you know it's part-time, right?" in trying to justify the rate, to which I responded, roughly;
"Yes, I do. It means I still make 4 or 5 trips across town every week, I just don't stay as long each time. I do a lower volume of high-quality work, you pay a lower volume of high-quality salary. It's in balance until you lower the pay rate, but expect me not to lower the work quality." -silence-
her, incredulous tone - "How much is your school telling you to expect for these jobs?"
me - "Let's be clear about something. My school isn't telling me to expect anything. I expect something, which is to be paid something near what my job is worth. According to my previous jobs, as well as those of all my classmates and alumni, this job is clearly worth at least $25 an hour, if not $30. If you wouldn't call your boss right now and volunteer for a 50% pay cut, you can't really ask me to sign up for one."
In answer to "what do I do that's worth that amount of money an hour," I am in the field of Supply Chain Management. This project in particular is an overhaul of a large company's north american logistics mess. They have 10 or 12 carriers doing the bulk of their shipping, all reporting into one system, but the orders were generated in another system. The two frequently don't match. As I see it, step 1 is to go through almost three quarters of a million lines of exception reports in a database and comb them out straight. Step 2 is to find out which carrier causes these errors and why. Step 3 is to initiate supplier audits on their carriers, with a balanced score card that tells them how they're doing with their end of the bargain on a monthly basis. Step 4 is to roll the incoming data into the one system they should be using, instead of 2 systems (they paid for it for chrissake, use it already). And finally, step 5 is to award a higher % of business to the companies who enter the data incorrectly, thus incentivising correct transactions on their parts (for free), and negating the need for such a project ever again in the future.
_________________ [quote="Bloor"]He's either done too much and should stay out of the economy, done too little because unemployment isn't 0%, is a dumb ingrate who wasn't ready for the job or a brilliant mastermind who has taken over all aspects of our lives and is transforming us into a Stalinist style penal economy where Christian Whites are fed into meat grinders. Very confusing[/quote]
|