Busty Rhodes Wrote:
Benvolio Wrote:
at Milwaukee's Downer this afternoon,
That's wierd. I drove by there last weekend and almost stopped to see that. But ate at Beans and Barley instead.
So how was the movie?
The film was underwhelming. Considering it reconnected the main pieces from
21 Grams -- Watts, Penn --, plus brought in Alfonso Cuaron as producer, I was thinking it would be tremendous. But, take away the graininess of the film, and there is no comparison. Penn went hammy
way too much, particularly when plotting in his unpaid-for apt. (this was after the character had quit his office-furniture sales job) for the hijacking. The sidebar Black Panther/Zebra moments were forced, trying to make Sam Bicke a little more likeable (that he wasn't a misanthrope, just misunderstood; that he wanted some amorphous "good" for all humble [sic] people, not just himself). And, while one purpose of the film might have been to subvert the North American message of progress-at-any-cost, kakocracy-run-amok, with the hijacking it only demonstrates that, a, our rivals in the first war of the twenty-first century aren't very creative, since what they did on the eleventh had been plotted before (apparently... the disclaimer at the end makes it seem the makers pieced the movie together like a Harry Turtledove historic fiction); b, capitalism/the pursuit of a good life does not imperil man's survival, and the basis of it, the family unit (while Sam's marriage fizzled, and his children grew (generally) distant from him, the relationship between Don Cheadle's mechanic and said character's wife and son, while unexplored, was solid, and even though the mechanic did not just work, but own his own business); c, Nixon was a sour guy, but in Sam's deprivation and insecurity leading to homicide and a chance to be famous (and, moreso, powerful), we see Nixon. Who's it to whom we should not be sympathetic, again?