nobody Wrote:
mugwump67 Wrote:
For clarity's sake: I'm still getting my meds through medicaid, the doctor just had to okay the change.
I gotta say, I don't really see the problem here. Your doctor just had to approve exactly what meds you were given, and I see that as a pretty good part of the system. You would prefer to let some bureaucrat decide which meds will be substituted based on cost savings and take that decision away from your doctor?
And I gotta say again, I don't understand why there isn't a problem here.
Yes, I'm fine. I'm getting my meds. But Medicaid is paying THREE TIMES what they need to for my treatment--and Medicaid is going broke.
Most HMO's/PPO's require you to accept generics if they are available. If you are sensitive to generics, the plans provide the prior-auth mechanism to allow the doctor to override this standard. Thats the free-market solution and it seems to work for the vast majority of americans.
I'm kinda unusual. I don't want the patient making their own health care decisions. I don't think its a good idea for patients to walk into their doctor's office and demand a medication that they just saw on tv. If its not an emergency, and a patient develops concerns about a symptom, their first visit should be to their family doctor/GP for guidance--not to the Mayo clinic for an MRI and a specialist.
I think every american has a right to good, practical and reasonable health care. I do not think that every american has the right to brand-name health care. I don't think a health care system that allows consumers to choose a med because they think one pill looks cooler than another is sustainable.