Guide to PokerStars 45 Man Turbo Tournaments
---------------------------------
(Intro to the Intro)
I am by no means an expert Poker player, but I have had pretty consistent success at the turbo 45 man tournaments (sample size around 500), so I figured I'd do a brain dump. I know, I need another 30,000 tournaments before I know my true ROI yadda yadda yadda, but I think that given the smaller fields of these 45 mans you don't need a bazillion tourneys to have a general idea of whether you're doing OK. Maybe everything I'm suggesting is wildly wrong. Who knows.
---------------------------------
Hardgeus' Guide to PokerStars 45 Man Turbo Tournaments
Introduction/Audience
The audience for this guide is beginning players who are looking for a relatively safe way of learning the game and building a bankroll. It is also a guide specifically aimed at playing against mostly crappy players. I don't suggest you take my advice and try it out at the WSOP.
Why the 45 Man?
I have played several different structures of tournaments on PokerStars, and most of them left me feeling dirty in the morning. The 9 man Sit 'n Gos just don't seem to have enough payout for their variance. I didn't feel like I was crushing them, and I just had a slow slow upward grind. If I lost 4 or 5 in a row, I had a long grind to make back the money from those losses.
The larger tournaments, from 180 man up, were just too depressing. I couldn't stand sitting there for hours at a time, only to bust out on the bubble, or with a lame booby-prize of a mincash. Not only that, I could easily expect to lose 10 or 15 of those in a row before getting any sort of cash. No thanks.
The 45 man is the porridge that Goldilocks ate. The variance is not really markedly higher than the 9 man, and the payout is much more respectable. And while you don't get the big sexy payday of a 180 man, you can expect to get 2 or 3 first-place finishes (easily) in 45 mans in the same number of tries it takes you to get to one final table at a 180 man.
Why Turbo?
For quite a while I was sold on the 10 minute regular 45 man tourneys. I just felt that the variance was too high on the turbos, and I stuck to my guns. Then one day a poster on the 2+2 forums asked for opinions on turbos vs. regulars and I started crunching some stats on my games to post. Lo and behold, I was over 10% more profitable on the turbos than the regulars!
One obvious reason for this is that the rake on non-turbo 45 mans is usually around 20%, while the rake on turbos is usually 10% or even less. For example, at the one dollar level, the regular tournament is $1.20, while the turbo is $1.10. This may not seem like a big deal, but bear in mind that 40% ROI over the long term is very good – and a %10 cut from that profit makes a big difference.
I keep a spreadsheet of numbers and notes on every tournament I play, and I noticed something interesting: The early blind levels didn't really have a lot of effect on my ability to win the tournament. The first blind levels are really just a waiting room for the real game. My game was mostly made or broken once the blinds got up around 100/200 or so. Why bother spending the first 45 minutes just folding everything in sight? Crank up a turbo and have the tournament rapidly progress to the point where the blinds can actually add to your stack!
This guide is strictly regarding the $3.25 45 man turbo on Stars, and if my limited sample size is any indicator, also the $6.50 turbo.
Fundamentals
First of all, realize that cash games and tournaments are drastically different beasts. You can easily destroy yourself as a tournament player by failing to grasp this fact and only playing A+ premium hands as the blinds disintegrate your stack. In many ways, tournament Poker isn't really Poker at all. “Trueâ€
|