NFL 2009

Rick Derris · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:44 pm

It's time to say the shine has now come off of Matt Ryan.

Chalk this up to a sophomore slump or whatever but 7 TD's and 10 INT's in the the last 5 games is simply unacceptable. It is now a very real concern when these types of criticisms were unthinkable at the beginning of the season.

Jason Elam shouldn't be allowed to even travel back to ATL with the team. Seriously, you should be let go before you get to baggage claim. Any kicker that can't hit 9 of 10 from 40 yards in should be done and he's missed several HUGE kicks now.

I think the Falcons FAIL streak of never having back to back winning seasons may now remain intact.

Rick Derris · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:45 pm

Also, is there a TV contract with the NFL where ever team has to be on TV X amount of times?

For the life of me, I can't imagine another reason why CBS would subject people to this Raiders/Chiefs game.

Yail Bloor · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:27 pm

Rick Derris Wrote:

It's time to say the shine is now come off of Matt Ryan.

Chalk this up to a sophomore slump or whatever but 7 TD's and 10 INT's in the the last 5 games is simply unacceptable. It is now a very real concern when these types of criticisms were unthinkable at the beginning of the season.

Jason Elam shouldn't be allowed to even travel back to ATL with the team. Seriously, you should be let go before you get to baggage claim. Any kicker that can't hit 9 of 10 from 40 yards in should be done and he's missed several HUGE kicks now.

I think the Falcons FAIL streak of never having back to back winning seasons may now remain intact.

Confirm all of this . Tough loss today.

MontyTheMongoose · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:38 pm

FT Wrote:

The Dreaded Marco Wrote:

Bob, you just sealed your 'Boys fate there. Sorry.

haha

pretty much

two guns holla · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:04 pm

Rick Derris Wrote:

Also, is there a TV contract with the NFL where ever team has to be on TV X amount of times?

For the life of me, I can't imagine another reason why CBS would subject people to this Raiders/Chiefs game.

Yea that one was a head scratcher for me today too

FT · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:07 pm

MAX TARDCORE Wrote:

FT Wrote:

The Dreaded Marco Wrote:

Bob, you just sealed your 'Boys fate there. Sorry.

haha

pretty much

i fucking hate sports

Yail Bloor · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:17 pm

two guns holla Wrote:

Rick Derris Wrote:

Also, is there a TV contract with the NFL where ever team has to be on TV X amount of times?

For the life of me, I can't imagine another reason why CBS would subject people to this Raiders/Chiefs game.

Yea that one was a head scratcher for me today too

It was the only 4pm AFC game (both Sunday night and Monday are all AFC)

shiv · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:25 pm

nice catch moss.

Yail Bloor · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:38 pm

Fuck Brady is throwing to everybody BUT Welker tonight.

THROW TO WELKER, TOM.

paper · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:41 pm

Yail Bloor Wrote:

Fuck Brady is throwing to everybody BUT Welker tonight.

THROW TO WELKER, TOM.

co-sign

I'm down 12 points with Welker and Garcon....I should be able to pull this off.

Yail Bloor · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:42 pm

Ive been up like 20 all day but the dude im playing has Moss and I've got Welker. Now I'm losing.

paper · **Posted:** Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:46 pm

awesome, Garcon gets hurt. GAH!

edit- yeah he's fine...booya

paper · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:34 am

I cannot believe they just went for it.

Kingfish · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:37 am

paper Wrote:

I cannot believe they just went for it.

Bold move, but I think it was the right call.

shiv · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:37 am

bullshit call on the no catch though.

paper · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:44 am

Kingfish Wrote:

paper Wrote:

I cannot believe they just went for it.

Bold move, but I think it was the right call.

well, if they make it, it's a bold call that is genius, but it turns out it was idiotic.

e-stone · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:44 am

i will pay top $$$ for a .gif of belichick there at the end.

holy lols.

saint · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:28 pm **Posts:** 4271

wow, that was one of the dumbest coaching decisions i have ever seen.

timmyjoe42 · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:52 am

e-stone Wrote:

i will pay top $$$ for a .gif of belichick there at the end.

holy lols.

Is this the one?

Kingfish · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:53 am

paper Wrote:

Kingfish Wrote:

paper Wrote:

I cannot believe they just went for it.

Bold move, but I think it was the right call.

well, if they make it, it's a bold call that is genius, but it turns out it was idiotic.

Yeah, he's going to get beat up for it for sure.

DHRjericho · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:05 am

Saint Wrote:

wow, that was one of the dumbest coaching decisions i have ever seen.

Why's that? Because gaining 40 yds of position against a Manning led offense with 2 minutes left is going to make much of a difference. The Patriots average more than 2 yds per play. Some of you are gutless....plus i think Faulk had possession before he got thrown behind the 30.

I'd like to add that i'm in no way a Patriot fan...or Indy for that matter.

paper · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 2:10 am

Being gutless has nothing to do with it, it was a dumb move. Have some faith in your D, ferchrisake.

saint · **Joined:** Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:28 pm **Posts:** 4271

DHRjericho Wrote:

Saint Wrote:

wow, that was one of the dumbest coaching decisions i have ever seen.

Why's that? Because gaining 40 yds of position against a Manning led offense with 2 minutes left is going to make much of a difference. The Patriots average more than 2 yds per play. Some of you are gutless....plus i think Faulk had possession before he got thrown behind the 30.

I'd like to add that i'm in no way a Patriot fan...or Indy for that matter.

if they punt, they much more likely hold on to win. don't confuse stupidity with courage.

Black Magic Putin · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:46 am

paper Wrote:

Being gutless has nothing to do with it, it was a dumb move. Have some faith in your D, ferchrisake.

Peyton just owns Belichek, and it's pretty clear now that Bill knows it. he made that call because he's afraid of Peyton and he was right.

robotboy · **Posted:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:53 am

Kingfish Wrote:

paper Wrote:

I cannot believe they just went for it.

Bold move, but I think it was the right call.

????? how in any situation of any football game ever was that ever the right call. that was an epic brain fart by belichik

NFL 2009

Who is online