Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1648 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1 ... 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 ... 66  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:33 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-foo ... las-vegas/

This says Florida 10.5 over Cincy and Bama 4 to 4.5.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:45 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
UCLA actually will get a bowl, if Army loses to Navy this weekend. If Army wins, then they play Temple in the Eagle Bank Bowl, but if not UCLA gets to play Temple.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:03 am 
Offline
Street Teamer

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:56 pm
Posts: 80
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I am pissed (though not at all surprised) that the BCS honks copped out and put TCU and BSU in the same bowl. Aside from the fact that it probably won't even sell out, this pairing makes perfect sense. For starters, it saves one of the elite programs from getting embarrassed like The Tide last year against my Utes, and most importantly, by putting Florida against Cincinnati (no offense), it gives Verne Lundquist or Brent Musberger or whoever calls that game one more chance to send Tebow out with the knob-polishing they are so accustomed to giving him. After all, how are they going to do that if he's getting his chin-strap blown off by TCU's ridiculously good defense?? Boise St and TCU are good - just give them a chance, you pussies. I could see this scenario coming, but it doesn't make it any less disappointing now that it's a reality.

_________________
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt, and then it's just hilarious" - Mike Patton


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:06 am 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
typeslowly Wrote:
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I am pissed (though not at all surprised) that the BCS honks copped out and put TCU and BSU in the same bowl. Aside from the fact that it probably won't even sell out, this pairing makes perfect sense. For starters, it saves one of the elite programs from getting embarrassed like The Tide last year against my Utes, and most importantly, by putting Florida against Cincinnati (no offense), it gives Verne Lundquist or Brent Musberger or whoever calls that game one more chance to send Tebow out with the knob-polishing they are so accustomed to giving him. After all, how are they going to do that if he's getting his chin-strap blown off by TCU's ridiculously good defense?? Boise St and TCU are good - just give them a chance, you pussies. I could see this scenario coming, but it doesn't make it any less disappointing now that it's a reality.


I believe every game but the Rose and BCS Title game are still on FOX this year.
I know Boise State beat Oregon, but I don't know if they can beat TCU, Alabama, Florida or Texas in a game.
I also see TCU having difficulties against the SEC squads. The Frogs have played great football all year, but when they played Clemson, they didn't necessarily light them up. That's a quality win for the squad, but doesn't necessarily inspire me to believe that Jerry Hughes would get a chance to really light up Tebow.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:58 am 
Offline
A True Aristocrat of Freedom

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:46 am
Posts: 22121
Location: a worn-out debauchee and drivelling sot
I'm going to play devil's advocate. If all these teams want is an equal shot at the title/BCS games, didn't they get it?
I would have rather seen TCU/v Cincy and Boise v GT, but in the end, we all knew two of these teams would play each other.

Would you be happier if Boise was playing Florida? What about TCU? What about the Florida match up would be different if they were playing either of them instead of 'Natti?

I think this speaks to Bloor's larger point: all of these games are irrelevant, aside from Texas v Alabama -- and if you really think that the refs concocted a way to job that match up, you need to change the tinfoil in your hat.

_________________
Throughout his life, from childhood until death, he was beset by severe swings of mood. His depressions frequently encouraged, and were exacerbated by, his various vices. His character mixed a superficial Enlightenment sensibility for reason and taste with a genuine and somewhat Romantic love of the sublime and a propensity for occasionally puerile whimsy.
harry Wrote:
I understand that you, of all people, know this crisis and, in your own way, are working to address it. You, the madras-pantsed julip-sipping Southern cracker and me, the oldman hippie California fruit cake are brothers in the struggle to save our country.

FT Wrote:
LooGAR (the straw that stirs the drink)


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:22 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
Senator Ba HumGAR Wrote:
I

I think this speaks to Bloor's larger point: all of these games are irrelevant, aside from Texas v Alabama -- and if you really think that the refs concocted a way to job that match up, you need to change the tinfoil in your hat.


Is this directed at me?
I'm not saying the refs intentionally did anything, I'm just saying they may have misapplied a very specific rule to benefit a team that has a lot of clout in the Big 12 conference. Also that it might have come due to Pelini's tendency to really let the refs have it. Let's just say his persona isn't well received by officiating crews here in this conference, and he's probably lucky he hasn't got fined yet.

This is essentially why Husker fans and other folks think it was a bit conspiratorial:
In the Big 12 rules, the only time it’s stated that the game clock can be adjusted by replay is when a ruling on the field is reversed.

http://www.huskerextra.com/articles/200 ... 254469.txt

This is the local article describing the official reaction a day after the game went down.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:24 pm 
Offline
A True Aristocrat of Freedom

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:46 am
Posts: 22121
Location: a worn-out debauchee and drivelling sot
Promethium Wrote:
Senator Ba HumGAR Wrote:
I

I think this speaks to Bloor's larger point: all of these games are irrelevant, aside from Texas v Alabama -- and if you really think that the refs concocted a way to job that match up, you need to change the tinfoil in your hat.


Is this directed at me?
I'm not saying the refs intentionally did anything, I'm just saying they may have misapplied a very specific rule to benefit a team that has a lot of clout in the Big 12 conference. Also that it might have come due to Pelini's tendency to really let the refs have it. Let's just say his persona isn't well received by officiating crews here in this conference, and he's probably lucky he hasn't got fined yet.

This is essentially why Husker fans and other folks think it was a bit conspiratorial:
In the Big 12 rules, the only time it’s stated that the game clock can be adjusted by replay is when a ruling on the field is reversed.

http://www.huskerextra.com/articles/200 ... 254469.txt

This is the local article describing the official reaction a day after the game went down.


I have a ton of friends who think the refs jobbed UGA to get LSU a better record, and that they jobbed Auburn because Bama was gonna have a chance at the Championship.

I think you have a gripe, but as always in a 60 minute game, it's hard to pin a loss on one thing.

_________________
Throughout his life, from childhood until death, he was beset by severe swings of mood. His depressions frequently encouraged, and were exacerbated by, his various vices. His character mixed a superficial Enlightenment sensibility for reason and taste with a genuine and somewhat Romantic love of the sublime and a propensity for occasionally puerile whimsy.
harry Wrote:
I understand that you, of all people, know this crisis and, in your own way, are working to address it. You, the madras-pantsed julip-sipping Southern cracker and me, the oldman hippie California fruit cake are brothers in the struggle to save our country.

FT Wrote:
LooGAR (the straw that stirs the drink)


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:31 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
Senator Ba HumGAR Wrote:

I think you have a gripe, but as always in a 60 minute game, it's hard to pin a loss on one thing.


I completely agree with this, just like I did with Derris.
The one second controversy doesn't occur without the kickoff out of bounds, horse collar tackle and two controversial PI calls.
It was a badly officiated game overall, and a piss poor husker offense allowed it to be a factor.
I never expected Nebraska to have a chance that late in the game, so when it ended like that it was hard not feel like you got screwed.
I will say that without replay, Nebraska probably wouldn't have had a first down until the 2nd half. As pathetic as that sounds, the ref spot work on that play was a sure sign things wouldn't be going our way that night.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:14 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
Notre Dame QB Clausen to leave early for NFL draft

Monday, Dec. 7, 2009 - 11:06 a.m. ET

On the advice of former coach Charlie Weis, Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen will forgo his senior season to enter the NFL draft, ESPN reports.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:42 pm 
Offline
Smoke
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:40 am
Posts: 10590
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell
Promethium Wrote:
Senator Ba HumGAR Wrote:
I

I think this speaks to Bloor's larger point: all of these games are irrelevant, aside from Texas v Alabama -- and if you really think that the refs concocted a way to job that match up, you need to change the tinfoil in your hat.


Is this directed at me?



I think your game is just the latest to bring out such conspiracy theories. We've been dealing with them all year with the referees in the SEC where several HUGE calls have gone the way of Alabama and Florida. NOBODY had a worse year than SEC officiating crews.

Bottom line is that we're all pretty much arguing for a playoff in one way or another. Pulling for BCS chaos doesn't make these BCS bowls any more relevant. It may make them important to strengthen ones position against the BCS but it doesn't make them more relevant outside of those teams respective fanbases.

I mean, GT vs Iowa. BLECH. Congrats. You're the Orange Bowl Champ which amounts to nothing.

If anything I think BCS detractors will be pulling for Cincy to upset Florida so there will be 3 undefeated teams thereby throwing more egg on the face of the system.

I honestly think that, in the end, the reason the BCS will be changed at some point in our lives will be because the people that oversee it and run it will literally just give up defending it out of sheer exhaustion. I mean, I don't know how any rational human can continue to defend it year after year after year.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:44 pm 
Offline
Hipster Backlash
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:05 pm
Posts: 2964
Location: A Very Red State
Promethium Wrote:
Notre Dame QB Clausen to leave early for NFL draft

Monday, Dec. 7, 2009 - 11:06 a.m. ET

On the advice of former coach Charlie Weis, Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen will forgo his senior season to enter the NFL draft, ESPN reports.


Jake Locker will be announcing his decision soon as well. Sadly, I expect him to do the same, as he is projected to be the first QB off the draft board.

I can't blame him for leaving early, but I'd love for him to come back for his senior year.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 1:51 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:35 am
Posts: 14323
Location: cincy
I hope this keeps Brian Kelly from the consideration of inheriting a talentless roster.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:34 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
http://www.mockingthedraft.com/2009/12/ ... en-in-jump

Golden Tate is going Pro as well.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:39 pm 
Offline
Indie Debut
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:27 am
Posts: 1562
If I were Kelly, that would seal my decision to stay at Cincinnati right there.

_________________
It is traumatic to live with nutty breed of human, all in the name of family-hood.


Back to top
 Profile YIM 
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:49 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
http://www.stiffarmtrophy.com/

It's currently a four horse race with Suh barely leading the field, but having the most first place votes.
According to the twitter feed of alleged Heisman voters being referenced on Huskerpedia, Suh currently has 42 first place votes.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:32 pm 
Offline
Hair Trigger of Doom

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:05 pm
Posts: 21295
Location: Subpoenaed in Texas
Have they announced yet who's getting invited to New York for the actual ceremony? Don't they usually only invite three finalists or so?

_________________
bendandscoop.com


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:36 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
FT Wrote:
Have they announced yet who's getting invited to New York for the actual ceremony? Don't they usually only invite three finalists or so?


They announce tonight on the 6pm EST Sports Center. They usually have 3-5 invites.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:44 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
http://tinyurl.com/ydppkom

I really love how everyone who advocates a playoff conveniently disregards the bowl money or believes that including every conference champion in the playoff and keeping the bowl system along with the play off will work.
There's no way the BCS conference teams want to play in a playoff that would most likely generate them less profit than playing in a "New Years Day" Bowl game.
Also from looking at this list, would you really watch a playoff game between Cincinnati and Central Michigan when you could watch possible two or three loss teams like Nebraska-Miami, Oklahoma-Notre Dame and Georgia-USC facing off in bowl match-ups?

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:48 pm 
Offline
Hair Trigger of Doom

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:05 pm
Posts: 21295
Location: Subpoenaed in Texas
typeslowly Wrote:
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I am pissed (though not at all surprised) that the BCS honks copped out and put TCU and BSU in the same bowl. Aside from the fact that it probably won't even sell out, this pairing makes perfect sense. For starters, it saves one of the elite programs from getting embarrassed like The Tide last year against my Utes, and most importantly, by putting Florida against Cincinnati (no offense), it gives Verne Lundquist or Brent Musberger or whoever calls that game one more chance to send Tebow out with the knob-polishing they are so accustomed to giving him. After all, how are they going to do that if he's getting his chin-strap blown off by TCU's ridiculously good defense?? Boise St and TCU are good - just give them a chance, you pussies. I could see this scenario coming, but it doesn't make it any less disappointing now that it's a reality.


BRA-VO, Jerry! Standing O!!!

_________________
bendandscoop.com


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:04 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
Jim Harbaugh and Brian Kelly are both interviewing with Notre Dame, and supposedly Houston Nutt is being wooed by Kansas.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:21 pm 
Offline
Smoke
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:40 am
Posts: 10590
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell
Promethium Wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/ydppkom

I really love how everyone who advocates a playoff conveniently disregards the bowl money or believes that including every conference champion in the playoff and keeping the bowl system along with the play off will work.
There's no way the BCS conference teams want to play in a playoff that would most likely generate them less profit than playing in a "New Years Day" Bowl game.



Not sure I see that article dismissing the money. He talks about the billions being left on the table. Why wouldn't all of that work?

UGA is unranked and playing in a bowl game. We'll sell out our alottment of tickets for the game and I will certainly be watching the game. If the scenario in the article was in place, UGA wouldn't be sniffing the tournament (much like we aren't sniffing a Championship these days) but guess what, I would still be watching that "bowl game" outside of the playoff and we'd still sell our alottment of tix and travel to the game. You're telling me there is no value in that?

How do you figure schools would see less profit than playing in a New Years bowl? You don't think sponsors won't be falling all over themselves to be the "National Semi-Final Game presented by Tostitos!" If you build it they will come and the payouts would be bigger than ever IMO.

Promethium Wrote:
Also from looking at this list, would you really watch a playoff game between Cincinnati and Central Michigan when you could watch possible two or three loss teams like Nebraska-Miami, Oklahoma-Notre Dame and Georgia-USC facing off in bowl match-ups?


As a matter of fact, I would watch that Cincy/CM game for the exact reasons he lays out in the article; for the drama. The David and Goliath storyline. Not to mention that CM's only two losses came against Boston College and Arizona and they BEAT Michigan St..Any given Saturday man.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:37 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
Rick Derris Wrote:




UGA is unranked and playing in a bowl game. We'll sell out our alottment of tickets for the game and I will certainly be watching the game. If the scenario in the article was in place, UGA wouldn't be sniffing the tournament (much like we aren't sniffing a Championship these days) but guess what, I would still be watching that "bowl game" outside of the playoff and we'd still sell our alottment of tix and travel to the game. You're telling me there is no value in that?

How do you figure schools would see less profit than playing in a New Years bowl? You don't think sponsors won't be falling all over themselves to be the "National Semi-Final Game presented by Tostitos!" If you build it they will come and the payouts would be bigger than ever IMO.


As a matter of fact, I would watch that Cincy/CM game for the exact reasons he lays out in the article; for the drama. The David and Goliath storyline. Not to mention that CM's only two losses came against Boston College and Arizona and they BEAT Michigan St..Any given Saturday man.


No, I was actually arguing that the value in the bowl system still probably exceeds the playoffs in all ways, thus why a mediocre Georgia team wouldn't be too broken up about missing out on a playoff if they still got bowl cash.
I personally don't think they payouts will be bigger based on the NCAA March Madness payouts and sponsorship versus travel cost and having to share the money equally with all 11 conferences. If the sponsors are going to be clamoring for sponsorship of the Semi-Final, are they really going to continue to sponsor their lowly bowl. Also what company really wants to sponsor the first round of the FBS playoffs, if they can pair up with the rival network of the playoffs for lesser cash to broadcast a few marquee bowl games?
You would also expect the playoffs to maintain a rule that states only two teams per conference can possibly make the playoff, or at least require at large teams to make their title game.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:48 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
Promethium Wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/ydppkom

I really love how everyone who advocates a playoff conveniently disregards the bowl money or believes that including every conference champion in the playoff and keeping the bowl system along with the play off will work.
There's no way the BCS conference teams want to play in a playoff that would most likely generate them less profit than playing in a "New Years Day" Bowl game.
Also from looking at this list, would you really watch a playoff game between Cincinnati and Central Michigan when you could watch possible two or three loss teams like Nebraska-Miami, Oklahoma-Notre Dame and Georgia-USC facing off in bowl match-ups?


The TV money generated by a playoff would more than make up for the bowl revenue. Part of this is of course created by the BCS itself: All bowl games are now essentially pointless exhibitions save the Championship Game so there's no guarantee that Team A or TeamB is going to actually show up to play in Bowl X and why should they? They get payed no matter. Also, as a fan you have to be a pretty sick fuck to care whther your team showed up in the 2007 Meineke Car Care Bowl.

The only two bowl games that I can guarantee you that I will watch are the Independence and the Championship Game; everything else falls into the hopper against what ever I happen to be doing at the time. If there is a more compelling NBA or NFL Game, shitty reality show or interesting magazine article to be had then the bowl game will probably not get watched. On the other hand, I can guarantee you that I would watch the shit out of a playoff game the same way I would watch the NCAA Hoops Tournament or the NFL or NBA playoffs. Hell, I think college baseball and hockey are beyond unwatchable but I've watched the CWS and Frozen Four many times. It counts for something, unlike the Gator Bowl which only counts for giving nerds and superfans one more game and the announcers one more chance to slip in the sponsor's names.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 8:03 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
The current BCS TV contract is worth 125 Million a year with ESPN having it until 2014. I just don't see how it can go up enough to pay out more than the 36 million that the SEC gets for two games this year when they would have to share cash with the Sun Belt conference.
I see you guys viewpoint, I just have my doubts.

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: College Football 2009
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 8:04 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 8889
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska USA
The Heisman finalist are :
Gerhart, Ingram, McCoy, Suh and Tebow

_________________
Rock 'n Roll: The most brutal, ugly, desperate, vicious form of expression it has been my misfortune to hear.
Frank Sinatra


Back to top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1648 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1 ... 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 ... 66  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Style by Midnight Phoenix & N.Design Studio
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.