are these from that ruined photo blog?

I like the bruises.

budweiser's got a cute face

if it wasn't for the mullet shirt, i'd totally buy that that picture was from the 70s

yeah they sort of broke the integrity of the pic with that oversight

And the Hank Jr. logo over the Stars and Bars which didn't exist in '77.

that girl is the best kind of trashy.

what i said probably came off as nitpicky, but it was also a compliment.

Chick on the left = Dani Woodward?

fuh x 3

fuh x3 squared.

Not to hijack this thread into a discussion of the merit -- of lack thereof -- of Bocephus, in comparison to his father & son, but since you mention it -- is it proper to find fault with Hank, Jr., for creating the music he did, which was, largely, a product of his era of country music, louder guitars, brighter lights, more of a show? &, of course, his estranged son, Hank III, has migrated into the scene-endorsed confines of "alt-country", which "returns country to its roots" (which is to mean, IT'S BETTER BECAUSE IT SOUNDS OLD, SO BUZZ-OFF, BUZZ-KILL; SO WHAT IF OUR OTHER FAVOURITE MUSICS ARE AGNIMALG GOLEGTIG AND GARCADE FAIRE, WHICH ARE BRILLIANT EXACTLY BECAUSE THEY SOUND LIKE THEY MIGHT BE FROM THE FUTURE!?), but that, too, is a factor of the era in which Hank 3 is recording. Much more stripped-down country being recorded, now, & even the bigger names, while retaining the core of the late 60s/early 70s energy, try at times for a more laidback groove (Kenny Chesney, & such). It just seems a pile-on, with no reason whatsoever, to lambaste Hank, Jr., is all I'm saying.

But, yeah, we really should be focusing on the panties, up top. Especially the one obscuring hers with a bottle of (puke) Bud. (I have not willingly drunk any Anheuser product, ever. But I'd make an exception to get next to her.)

Focus on the panties.