Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 644 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
Smoke
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:40 am
Posts: 10590
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell
Yail Bloor Wrote:
timmyjoe42 Wrote:
Bye Lou. I was hoping you'd come back to Cincy, but I guess not. :(


He went out taking a monumental ass whipping. All is right with the world.



Except for the fact that Derek Lee was on a milk cartoon for the whole series. Holy bad first impression.

But hey, I'll keep taking series wins the rest of the way.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:21 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 7979
Rick Derris Wrote:
Except for the fact that Derek Lee was on a milk cartoon for the whole series. Holy bad first impression.

what were you expecting from him in the midst of by far his worst season?


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:25 pm 
Offline
Fluke Breakthrough Single
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2255
Location: Omicron Persei 8
What's this shit going on in Texas right now?


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:13 am 
Offline
Post-Breakup Solo Project
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:48 am
Posts: 3259
Location: Philadelphia/New Jersey
This Phillies-Astros game is bonkers. Ryan Howard gets thrown out real quick for arguing balls and strikes in the 14th inning for really doing not much more than looking at the 3rd base ump, who did it knowing that the Phils didn't have anybody left on their bench. So they have to move Raul Ibanez to 1st and put Roy Oswalt in left.

And of course the first batter hit it right to Oswalt. Lucky it was an easy play.

_________________
catswilleatyou Wrote:
my diet is 75% buffalo chicken so i don't trust myself to go commando


http://www.strikerbill.com Check it out hombre.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:42 am 
Offline
May contain Jesus.
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 11:43 pm
Posts: 12275
Location: The Already, Not Yet.
This Johnny Damon story is pretty great. Glad he stuck it with the Tigers.

_________________
It's Baltimore, gentlemen; the gods will not save you.

Baltimore is a town where everyone thinks they’re normal, but they’re totally insane. In New York, they think they’re crazy, but they’re perfectly normal. --John Waters
Image


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:58 am 
Offline
Still Big in Japan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:04 pm
Posts: 3824
Location: Indie-anapolis
Flying Rabbit Wrote:
This Johnny Damon story is pretty great. Glad he stuck it with the Tigers.


Yes, this was happy news to wake up to this morning.

_________________
[url=http://www.last.fm/user/andyfest/?chartstyle=basicrt10] [img]http://imagegen.last.fm/basicrt10/recenttracks/andyfest.gif[/img] [/url]


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:34 am 
Offline
Rape Gaze
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:03 pm
Posts: 27347
Location: bitch i'm on the internet
No, this is the best Johnny Damon story

http://www.google.com/m/url?client=ms-a ... p1u3Xn44cA

_________________
Image


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:56 am 
Offline
Still Big in Japan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:04 pm
Posts: 3824
Location: Indie-anapolis
shiv Wrote:
No, this is the best Johnny Damon story

http://www.google.com/m/url?client=ms-a ... p1u3Xn44cA


That site sucks, I can barely read the headline before the screen goes blank. I've tried two different browsers. That said, the headline is entertaining/sad enough for me.

_________________
[url=http://www.last.fm/user/andyfest/?chartstyle=basicrt10] [img]http://imagegen.last.fm/basicrt10/recenttracks/andyfest.gif[/img] [/url]


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:02 pm 
Offline
Rape Gaze
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:03 pm
Posts: 27347
Location: bitch i'm on the internet
yeah I dunno what's up with it.

_________________
Image


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:44 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:41 pm
Posts: 9020
Strasberg needs Tommy John Surgery. Out for the Year and probably all of next year as well.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:48 pm 
Offline
frostingspoon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:35 am
Posts: 14323
Location: cincy
The 'Nats can't buy a break, but they did beat St. Louis last night, heh.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 6:51 pm 
Offline
Fluke Breakthrough Single
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2255
Location: Omicron Persei 8
It seems like that always happens with phenoms.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:03 pm 
Offline
Smoke
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:40 am
Posts: 10590
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell
Lrr Wrote:
It seems like that always happens with phenoms.


It's not just phenoms but they get the most press. To me it's more indicative of a couple things.

The cost of aces has gone through the roof and as such organizations have been over protective of their upcoming phenoms. These guys have been coddled since they were probably 15 or 16 and their pitch counts monitered, etc. Ironically when they finally get the show their arms aren't ready to handle to load that an ace is required to handle.

There are examples that contradict this of course but the protection of pitchers is a big debate.

Also, the rise of the middle relief guy has play some role as well.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:16 am
Posts: 5271
Location: Right behind you! Boo!
Rick Derris Wrote:
Ironically when they finally get the show their arms aren't ready to handle to load that an ace is required to handle.


But was Strasburg already given that load?

This isn't really that new of a thing either. Jim Palmer pitched 200+ innings as a 20-year old in 1966, but less than 50 in 1967 and 0 in 1968. And I think Tommy John may have had Tommy John surgery.

Anyway, this is not unexpected at all. My brother almost got into fights in the DC area when he suggested Strasburg would soon be on the DL after he was promoted. The perils of an O's fan.

_________________
Half-insane and half-god


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:11 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
Further proof that baseball players have got to be the dumbest athletes: Tony LaRussa and Albert Pujols to be guests at Glen Beck rally in DC

I say they are dumb not because they are going, but because LaRussa believes
Quote:
I don't know who's going to be there, who's going to accept it. But the gist of the day is not political.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:32 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:41 pm
Posts: 9020
Rick Derris Wrote:
Lrr Wrote:
It seems like that always happens with phenoms.


It's not just phenoms but they get the most press. To me it's more indicative of a couple things.

The cost of aces has gone through the roof and as such organizations have been over protective of their upcoming phenoms. These guys have been coddled since they were probably 15 or 16 and their pitch counts monitered, etc. Ironically when they finally get the show their arms aren't ready to handle to load that an ace is required to handle.

There are examples that contradict this of course but the protection of pitchers is a big debate.

Also, the rise of the middle relief guy has play some role as well.



I'm not sure what your point is and how relevant it is to Strasberg's injury. The whole point of how most teams coddle their phenoms is to slowly build up arm strength through carefully managing the number of innings a pitcher pitches year by year so that a young pitcher can handle 200+ innings at the MLB and not risk injury or having a dead arm the next year after his first full season as a MLB starter. Are you saying that somehow makes pitchers more susceptible to injury?

A) That doesn't make much sense
B) Even if it did, Strasberg was having his innings managed and was due to be shut down soon but was kind of thrown right into the fire with little time at all in the minors.

If this is a pitch count issue that you are trying to raise, Strasberg was never allowed to even hit the 100 pitch count in any of his ML starts. I'm not really sure what you are saying. I don't know if the Nats did anything wrong here or if this is just one of those things. Lots of young pitchers have arm injuries. Thankfully, most come back as good as ever after TJ surgery. He'll just lose some time which is a bigger deal for him than most given his big contract and how he's already the Nats biggest star.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:37 pm 
Offline
Smoke
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:40 am
Posts: 10590
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell
shmoo Wrote:
Rick Derris Wrote:
Ironically when they finally get the show their arms aren't ready to handle to load that an ace is required to handle.


But was Strasburg already given that load?


Wasn't speaking about him directly. The Nats have done what everyone says you're supposed to do. He's not even topped 100 pitches in any start as of yet (I don't think) and it still happened. Sometimes shit just happens. Was speaking more generally. I don't know the stats but it seems like Tommy John has become more and more frequent with guys in the last 15 years.

Quote:
This isn't really that new of a thing either. Jim Palmer pitched 200+ innings as a 20-year old in 1966, but less than 50 in 1967 and 0 in 1968. And I think Tommy John may have had Tommy John surgery.


I'm not sure what you're getting at here. I'm sure that the term "pitch count" was almost non-existent back then though.

I'm just coming around to the Nolan Ryan school of thinking in that up and comers need to pitch MORE, not less.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:38 pm 
Offline
Smoke
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:40 am
Posts: 10590
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell
See my response to bort, bilgy.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:06 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:41 pm
Posts: 9020
Rick Derris Wrote:
I don't know the stats but it seems like Tommy John has become more and more frequent with guys in the last 15 years.


Part of the reason for this though is that they've become so good at it that it isn't nearly as big a deal to have TJ surgery. Now some guys come back and actually gain a few MPH on their fastball post surgery.

In other words, is the trend more injuries or more surgeries?


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:41 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:16 am
Posts: 5271
Location: Right behind you! Boo!
Rick Derris Wrote:
See my response to bort, bilgy.


I'm shmoo. :wave:

_________________
Half-insane and half-god


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:03 pm 
Offline
Fluke Breakthrough Single
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:57 pm
Posts: 2255
Location: Omicron Persei 8
I think a big part of ti is simply that the media blow up every prospect to be the next Cy Young when very few pan out over an entire career. That's just the way it is. Pitching consistently is hard.


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:12 pm 
Offline
Whiskey Tango
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 21753
Location: REDLANDS
billy g Wrote:
Now some guys come back and actually gain a few MPH on their fastball post surgery.


Especially when their post surgery rehab includes HGH.

_________________
"To keep you is no benefit. To destroy you is no loss."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:33 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:16 am
Posts: 5271
Location: Right behind you! Boo!
billy g Wrote:
Now some guys come back and actually gain a few MPH on their fastball post surgery.


Some, for sure, but look at Mark Prior, Francisco Liriano, Erik Bedard... There's no guarantee that Strasburg is going to be better than ever.

_________________
Half-insane and half-god


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:32 pm 
Offline
Winona Ryder wears my t-shirt on TV
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:15 pm
Posts: 2545
Location: Slow Death, CA
billy g Wrote:
Rick Derris Wrote:
Lrr Wrote:
It seems like that always happens with phenoms.


It's not just phenoms but they get the most press. To me it's more indicative of a couple things.

The cost of aces has gone through the roof and as such organizations have been over protective of their upcoming phenoms. These guys have been coddled since they were probably 15 or 16 and their pitch counts monitered, etc. Ironically when they finally get the show their arms aren't ready to handle to load that an ace is required to handle.

There are examples that contradict this of course but the protection of pitchers is a big debate.

Also, the rise of the middle relief guy has play some role as well.



I'm not sure what your point is and how relevant it is to Strasberg's injury. The whole point of how most teams coddle their phenoms is to slowly build up arm strength through carefully managing the number of innings a pitcher pitches year by year so that a young pitcher can handle 200+ innings at the MLB and not risk injury or having a dead arm the next year after his first full season as a MLB starter. Are you saying that somehow makes pitchers more susceptible to injury?

A) That doesn't make much sense
B) Even if it did, Strasberg was having his innings managed and was due to be shut down soon but was kind of thrown right into the fire with little time at all in the minors.

If this is a pitch count issue that you are trying to raise, Strasberg was never allowed to even hit the 100 pitch count in any of his ML starts. I'm not really sure what you are saying. I don't know if the Nats did anything wrong here or if this is just one of those things. Lots of young pitchers have arm injuries. Thankfully, most come back as good as ever after TJ surgery. He'll just lose some time which is a bigger deal for him than most given his big contract and how he's already the Nats biggest star.


Read somewhere the Nats were tweaking his change up and repeatedly throwing that pitched caused the damage to his elbow. Pretty ironic if true.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MLB 2010
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:52 am 
Offline
Death

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:43 am
Posts: 4797
Location: STL
They lowered the mounds in 1969, first Tommy John surgery in 1974. THINK ABOUT IT.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 644 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 26  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Style by Midnight Phoenix & N.Design Studio
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.