Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 3:39 pm 
Offline
Rape Gaze
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:03 pm
Posts: 27347
Location: bitch i'm on the internet
ayah Wrote:
yes. i have a ny times newspaper clipping at home of a review of a show in a nyc gallery. this was a professional gallery showing non student work and this woman built herself into a false wall in the gallery. it took her a few weeks but she ate the plasterboard (she did swallow) until most of it was gone. she slept and everythiong else in there until the exhibit was over.

i wish i was making this up.


sounds somewhat better than that spaghetti-o's girl.

_________________
Image


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:43 am 
Offline
Garage Band
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:50 am
Posts: 576
Location: Mundus illegitimis
bort Wrote:
the power and creativity of music is limitless, but glittering prizes and endless compromises shattered the illusion of integrity

_________________
Image


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:08 am 
Offline
A True Aristocrat of Freedom

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 11:46 am
Posts: 22121
Location: a worn-out debauchee and drivelling sot
Drinky Wrote:
Maybe, but there were certainly times when it seemed to be more at the forefront of what was driving culture. And that was certainly evident at the time.

Like when Nirvana and grunge and Dr. Dre and gangsta rap were big, you knew it. It permeated culture immediately. They changed the musical landscape for a solid decade or more, and that wasn't just apparent in hindsight.

And that's just an example of the last time I remember this happening in my lifetime. Maybe it happened again later, and I was just too old to really be affected. But it really seems like the influence of music on culture has tapered off, unless you count American Idol. But I think that's more a case of the inverse. Society and culture driving the means by which music is produced and consumed. Music subverted to a game show format.


You're talking about a media problem and not a music problem. Everyone here has their own personal "why do people like The Stones so much when they stole everything from Gram and Ry Cooder" and everyone has their own "in hs people liked Pearl Jam and Live, and I liked Bob Dylan and the Wu Tang Clan" example, and that's why we're here, and the people I went to college with still listen to the same 19 records we all owned back then.

ayah Wrote:
pass me my beret as we sit and discuss the death of painting...people love to proclaim that painting is dead all the time. it's such an affectation. painting as a main means of telling a history or as a political protest is not as popular as it used to be because we now have photography and magazines and newspapers (print and digital) to do those things for us. would guernica be as powerful/popular if it was painted today? perhaps but i'm not convinced.

the very cynical side of me says that painting is dead because the untalented mooks who call themselves artists got through four years of school building themselves inside plasterboard cubes and chewing their way out of them. to me that's more of an eating disorder and a laziness for acquiring any real craft.

everything goes 'round and 'round. in the end, i agree with harry...you all be gettin' old. try and be gracious about it.


I like this because, in my mind, you wear a beret anyway. And, as someone who is fascinated by painting as an art form, because I can't draw a stick figure, and every time I go to a museum like MoMA or The National Portrait Gallery (yes I'm a suburban n00b who's likes facile and pedantic art) I feel like I did the first time I heard Exile or the first time I saw Goodfellas.

Even if it's all been done to death, if we've all seen and done everything there is to do, certain things will always shine through. The cream will rise, and people won't even notice because they're eating at Applebee's, shopping at Forever 21, and listening to Rihana.

_________________
Throughout his life, from childhood until death, he was beset by severe swings of mood. His depressions frequently encouraged, and were exacerbated by, his various vices. His character mixed a superficial Enlightenment sensibility for reason and taste with a genuine and somewhat Romantic love of the sublime and a propensity for occasionally puerile whimsy.
harry Wrote:
I understand that you, of all people, know this crisis and, in your own way, are working to address it. You, the madras-pantsed julip-sipping Southern cracker and me, the oldman hippie California fruit cake are brothers in the struggle to save our country.

FT Wrote:
LooGAR (the straw that stirs the drink)


Back to top
 Profile WWW 
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:34 am 
Offline
Fluke Breakthrough Single
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:17 am
Posts: 2452
Location: getting right with the lord
authentic art takes authentic experiences and doesn't stem out of the calculative mind... but I feign no hypotheses and won't defend them either.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:37 am 
Offline
TEH MACHINE
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Posts: 16684
Location: Jiggin' for Yanks
f4df Wrote:
authentic art takes authentic experiences and doesn't stem out of the calculative mind... but I feign no hypotheses and won't defend them either.


I don't know if I totally agree with this. The calculative mind can some up with neat stuff.

_________________
All I can say is, go on and bleed.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:40 am 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:03 pm
Posts: 6402
don't discredit your taste in art as facile and pedantic. those are words that pompous, shallow people would use in judgement of others and they should all be drowned in a river like a small sack of kittens in a grimm's fairytale.

all i ever ask of people is to look around and keep your eyes open. surprises are everywhere. not everything can be found in a gallery or museum. you like what you like. enjoy it. think about it. it adds to the quality of life.

no diatribe here...just some random thoughts...

ps--i don't own a beret but in secret i wish i did.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:41 am 
Offline
Fluke Breakthrough Single
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:17 am
Posts: 2452
Location: getting right with the lord
DumpJack Wrote:
f4df Wrote:
authentic art takes authentic experiences and doesn't stem out of the calculative mind... but I feign no hypotheses and won't defend them either.


I don't know if I totally agree with this. The calculative mind can some up with neat stuff.


it does, it can- just not art.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:43 am 
Offline
TEH MACHINE
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Posts: 16684
Location: Jiggin' for Yanks
f4df Wrote:
DumpJack Wrote:
f4df Wrote:
authentic art takes authentic experiences and doesn't stem out of the calculative mind... but I feign no hypotheses and won't defend them either.


I don't know if I totally agree with this. The calculative mind can some up with neat stuff.


it does, it can- just not art.


Art has a pretty loose definition in my mind.

_________________
All I can say is, go on and bleed.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:45 am 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:03 pm
Posts: 6402
i'm not sure that i understand what you mean by authentic art and experiences.

some art is very emotional and narrative but there are also pieces based soley on color/optic theory or mathematics. are those authentic experiences?

not fighting here...i'm genuinely curious.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:47 am 
Offline
Fluke Breakthrough Single
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:17 am
Posts: 2452
Location: getting right with the lord
I am sure I would agree. But seeing as this is Teh Ob - I figured I had to make Hammurabic declarations and also refuse to support them with anything but pictures.

Image


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:48 am 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:03 pm
Posts: 6402
carry on.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:50 am 
Offline
Gayford R. Tincture

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 13644
Location: The Weapon Store
DumpJack Wrote:
f4df Wrote:
DumpJack Wrote:
f4df Wrote:
authentic art takes authentic experiences and doesn't stem out of the calculative mind... but I feign no hypotheses and won't defend them either.


I don't know if I totally agree with this. The calculative mind can some up with neat stuff.


it does, it can- just not art.


Art has a pretty loose definition in my mind.


Yeah, you can't put that kind of limit on it.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:55 am 
Offline
Fluke Breakthrough Single
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:17 am
Posts: 2452
Location: getting right with the lord
ayah Wrote:
i'm not sure that i understand what you mean by authentic art and experiences.

some art is very emotional and narrative but there are also pieces based soley on color/optic theory or mathematics. are those authentic experiences?

not fighting here...i'm genuinely curious.


I think that anything has the capacity to be an authentic experience- in that sense its subjective. What defines it is not any essential quality of the experience itself but rather the relation between it and the individual. But would I call pieces that *solely* explore mathematical principles or optical theory art? Not unless part of the reason for it is was the experience that it evoked in the artist. Otherwise it seems to be a technological or methodological exercise. But that is because I get to define what art is to me :P


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:58 am 
Offline
Gayford R. Tincture

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 13644
Location: The Weapon Store
Well yeah, you can put that kind of limit on it, if you feel the need to put restrictive limits on what is and isn't art.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:01 pm 
Offline
Fluke Breakthrough Single
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:17 am
Posts: 2452
Location: getting right with the lord
Drinky Wrote:
Well yeah, you can put that kind of limit on it, if you feel the need to put restrictive limits on what is and isn't art.



Well, if there aren't things that *arent* art, how can there be things that are art? hmmmmmm


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:04 pm 
Offline
Gayford R. Tincture

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 13644
Location: The Weapon Store
I'm going to bail out of this argument right here.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:37 pm 
Offline
Indie Debut
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 7:00 pm
Posts: 1516
f4df Wrote:
Drinky Wrote:
Well yeah, you can put that kind of limit on it, if you feel the need to put restrictive limits on what is and isn't art.



Well, if there aren't things that *arent* art, how can there be things that are art? hmmmmmm


that's actually a pretty good question.

_________________
Anna Merkel looking for somebody to fistbump


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:41 pm 
Offline
Gayford R. Tincture

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 13644
Location: The Weapon Store
*unnecessarily* restrictive limits


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:02 pm 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:32 pm
Posts: 8283
Location: viewing the fall....
I'm going with the saturation argument. It becomes much harder to swim as the water turns to quicksand. I think this is also a function of the aging thing. The "new and exciting" is much more difficult to find now. Kinda the reason my np: is a mix of '70's soft rock.

_________________
because you're empty, and I'm empty

Cotton Wrote:
I'd probably just drink myself to death. More so, I mean.


"Hey Judas. I know you've made a grave mistake.
Hey Peter. You've been pretty sweet since Easter break."


Back to top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Obner
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 12:52 am 
Offline
Go Platinum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:37 pm
Posts: 7618
Location: Knee-deep and sinking
I compare the modern status of Art, and, as a subset, Rock-n-Roll, to global exploration. Once, there were empty areas of the map where nobody had tread. Vast quadrants of the globe were blank, questions were unanswered. Nobody knew the borders, or the absolute ends of anything. Those days are over.

In art, the day a blank canvas sold, or when the destruction of art was sold as art, or when graffiti went mainstream, it marked an ending of the possibilities. This didn't mean that new art couldn't be made, or that art couldn't make a statement unique and resonating to our souls. Amazing new art is made all the time. I love art. But the absolute limits of the genre have been mapped out - we have circumnavigated the globe of the possible. True, there are still gray areas to be filled in, and perhaps minor discoveries to be made. But there are no new continents out there to be discovered.

The same holds true for music. As proof, just look at the fracturing, ever-dividing subsets of genre. Music has reached the boundaries of what can be accepted as music. We cannot go heavier, we cannot go faster, or sparser. We can only create within what is already defined.

I'm not saying nothing new can be made. I am elated and uplifted by new art on a daily basis. But today the experience of newness is a personal quest - there are no cultural, societal based advancements anymore. There are no new perspectives to rattle the world, like cubism, like death metal, like 4'33 did. We're all exploring our own personal globes, and filling in our own details, but there are always other's footprints there before us.

Dr. K said that technology is the new rock and roll. Here I disagree. The love of technology predates R&R - look at the brownie camera craze, the phonograph. People have always loved the latest gizmo. Today, if anything, technology is a surrogate for rock and roll. An alternate for discovery. We console ourselves with the latest iphone because there is nothing else really new in our lives. We are desperate for exploration. But there is no where else to go.


Back to top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ] 

Board index : Music Talk : Rock/Pop

Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Style by Midnight Phoenix & N.Design Studio
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.