Senator LooGAR Wrote:
billy g Wrote:
I liked Bodie but Rawls was such an essential element to the show so Rawls.
I see we're voting using a different methodology than yesterday, William:
billy g Wrote:
Senator LooGAR Wrote:
It's funny because I think you learn a lot about what people think this show is about by their votes. I like Bubs, but I think Clay Davis is more essential to the story, and essentially more what the story is about.
You're overthinking this GAR. I know I'm just voting for the character that I personally find to provide me with higher entertainment value, whether it's the character more important to the show's storyline or not. I'd have to change about half my votes if I were trying to vote who I think is more important.
I also think you could make a pretty compelling case for Bubs as the more important character.
Not really even if my wording makes it seem so. When you say you think Clay Davis is more important to the show than Bubs because the show is about the failure of institutions, I disagree. Not about it being about the failure of institutions but about Clay Davis being essential to that storyline. You eliminate the Clay Davis character and you still have Royce, Rawls, Burrell, and others and that storyline and message are still effectively communicated. You remove Bubs and you've eliminated a main character who most effectively communicated how a few mistakes could lead to being trapped in the system and cycle of poverty and drug addiction. I think Bubs was more important to the show than Clay but Clay was far more entertaining than Bubs so I voted for him anyway.
Here, I liked the Bodie character although I didn't find him more entertaining than Rawls. He was more likable but that's not the point. It was a better show because Rawls was on it. You remove Rawls and major storylines are weakened. You substitute a garden variety hoodlum for Bodie and I don't think the show really suffers all that much. While I am voting for the more essential character by your definition here, I'm really doing it though because my own enjoyment of the show would be diminished if those storylines were weaker or not included so really I am being consistent. Put another way, I can't really imagine the show without Rawls so how can I imagine enjoying it as much? It's not hard to imagine the show without Bodie or imagine it still being a great show.