billy g Wrote:
Yail Bloor Wrote:
billy g Wrote:
You just have zero tolerance for country which is what the first two were.
No they weren't.
His new record is not only his best, but the best thing out this year (so far) in my opinion. But I think he's got a pretty solid catalog overall. Couldn't really care less about his sobriety or lack thereof.
Well, whatever you want to label them (and I'll admit that they're filed in the rock section of my collection) there are STRONG old timey country influences on the first two and whatever remarks Radcliffe makes about superior songwriting, growth as an artist, soulfulness, etc, my brain translates to the last two are much less country and thus Radcliffe is much more open to them. Nothing wrong with that but I just don't buy that they are a great leap forward or more soulful. In fact, Harlem River Blues sounds really flat to me where the debut really had a lot of swing to it.
I really tried with Harlem River Blues but it never grew on me and I've got a pretty high tolerance for what most people would call boring singer/songwriter types. I've only given the new one 3 listens but I'm not sure that it's going to get a fourth as I'd rate it well below Meh based on the first three listens.
Well, at least you admit you were wrong saying the first two were country. Sure, they've got the old timey country influence (and I've got a couple bootlegs from that era where his act was VERY old timey country--since you saw him a bunch during that time probably colors the way you hear those records. Nothing wrong with that.), but there is a lot more going on in a song like "South Georgia Sugar Babe" than country.
I openly disliked
Harlem River Blues when it came out to the point that i deleted it, then had a sort of epiphany with and decided that it's pretty damn good. I'm not gonna tell you what to listen to, but I think the new one is worth your attention. It's fucking infectious haha.