Sketch Wrote:
Promethium Wrote:
Sorry to hijack this thread, but speaking of conferences, how in the hell can the Big 10 be considered a legitimate conference when Iowa doesn't have to play either Michigan or Ohio State next season? That would be like Nebraska not plaing either Texas or Oklahoma in a season or Georgia not playing Florida or Auburn.
I didn't realize Iowa had a big enough rivalry with either school to cause outrage on this; their only in-conference trophy games are Wisconsin and Minnesota. Are you concerned that they will go undefeated the conference without playing OSU/UM because those are the only two 'quality' teams in the conference?
EDIT: If this is a case for the Big 10 to pickup a twelfth team and do the two-division/championship-game thing, the only way to prevent this scenario would be north-south split, putting UM and OSU in separate divisions. This will, in turn, mean that OSU-UM could play each other twice in a three-week-period if they are perenially the best teams in the conference. Instant yawn-fest.
My top 6:
1. OSU/FL winner
2. Boise State
3. OSU-if-lost/LSU
4. LSU/FL-if-lost
5. USC
6. Wisconsin
It is my concern that they would go unbeaten without playing one of the teams that consistantly wins the Big 10. While Wisconsin and Minnesota are clearly the rivalry games besides Iowa State out of conference, they aren't really the measuring stick games that Iowa and Kirk Ferentz need to prove themselves.
I'd rather see them have divisions and a conference championship game like the Big 12, SEC and ACC than have the three way ties for the Rose Bowl that they have had in the past.