Elvis Fu Wrote:
Rick Derris Wrote:
What is so hard to understand about that? Everyone is given their shot. If you're the better team you should win. If you lose, you have no argument. You had your shot. People complain about the BCS because it never lets people even HAVE the argument. How do you tell 5-6 teams with no losses or 1 loss that are in different conferences, with different teams, that a convoluted computer program says you aren't good enough to play for it all.
As stated previously, I just enjoy the old bowl system. But I don't see a playoff fixing this. Up until Oregon lost to Stanford, it was easy to hear comments that Oregon clearly deserved to be ranked higher than Boise State, because of the weakness of Boise's schedule, and despite Boise thumping Oregon in the opener.
Not only that the Idaho Statesman recently reported that
"close to 10 BCS teams" have turned down opportunities to play the Broncos. I saw in another paper that those proposals weren't even home & homes, Boise was willing to come to them, with no commitment to come to Idaho.
So if you have your playoff, and Oregon won the Pac-10 and got in, where would that leave an undefeated Boise State team that beat Oregon, especially with TCU and Cincinnati sitting undefeated as well? These problems aren't going away, and quite honestly, no one is worried about leaving out the small schools, they are only interested in "fairness" when it involves leaving out a USC, Oklahoma or SEC school.
I don't agree with the people only interested in fairness if it's their school angle. I think the playoff levels the field. You clearly think Boise St isn't getting the love they deserve but if the season ended right now they'd be in an 8 team playoff and they could prove it to the world. In fact, even if you had ACC Champ, SEC Champ, Big 12 Champ, Pac 10 Champ, Big 10 Champ, Big East Champ, you'd still have 2 at large teams which would be Boise and TCU. Yes there would be some hand wringing over who would get the at larges every year but it's better than being completely shut out every year isn't it?
As for Boise, I stand by my opinion that if they hadn't lost they should've been higher in the BCS than Boise
In fact, the BCS system will forever hurt the small schools simply due to the way it's set up. Why should an SEC school go play them? We've seen Ohio St. play through a weak schedule, not play a conference championship, and play for the National Championship. There is no incentive for a team from the SEC or the Big 12 to go play them. It only helps Boise and can hurt the other team. Another reason the system is flawed.
FYI, UGA played Boise in 2005 in Athens and beat them 48-13. Just sayin.